1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
juin [17]
3 years ago
6

Gray Company, a closely held C corporation, incurs a $50,000 loss on a passive activity during the year. The company has active

income of $34,000 and portfolio income of $24,000. If Gray is not a personal service corporation, it may deduct $34,000 of the passive activity loss.
a. true.
b. false.
Business
1 answer:
-Dominant- [34]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B) False: since it is still a closely held C corporation, it cannot reduce its ordinary income through passive losses. If it hadn't been a closely held C corporation then it could have made the deductions.

Explanation:

Passive losses are losses resulting from financial activities, i.e. investments in other corporations where the investor doesn't participate in.

Passive losses cannot offset ordinary income, they must be matched against passive gains only. If passive losses exceed passive gains, they can be carried forward without limitation.

The only exception applies to C corporations that are not;

  • closely held corporations or
  • personal service corporations.

Qualifying C corporations can actually deduct passive losses from certain ordinary income.  

Closely held C Corporations are corporations where during the last 6 months, 50% or more of its stock is owned by 5 or fewer investors.

You might be interested in
Scenario​ : The average total cost to produce 100 cookies is​ $0.25 per cookie. The marginal cost is constant at​ $0.10 for all
nika2105 [10]

Answer: D. $20

Explanation:

Total cost to produce 50 cookies = Total cost to produce 100 cookies - Marginal cost to produce 50 cookies

Total cost to produce 100 cookies is:

= Average total cost * number of cookies

= 0.25 * 100

= $25

Marginal cost to produce 50 cookies is:

= Constant marginal cost * number of cookies

= 0.10 * 5

= $5.00

Total cost to produce 50 cookies = 25 - 5

= $20.00

8 0
3 years ago
What are some requirements for Postal Service Mail Carriers?( Check all that apply. )
vlada-n [284]

Answer:

<h2><u><em>a.b,c,g</em></u></h2>

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Last year Acme paid Ralph $15,000 to install a new air-conditioning unit at its headquarters building. The air conditioner did n
Fynjy0 [20]

Explanation:

a. Ralph is in charge of the land, with an implicit right to payment in compliance with right doctrine (North American Oil Consol. v. Burnet (1932, S.Ct.) 286 US 414). This year, however, gross sales are made, although they may be reimbursed later.

b. Unless he returns money to Acme this year, Ralph will be able to claim a deduction of $5,000. Although Ralph originally paid the $1,750 tax on invoice and only saved $1,400 on the reduction of the refund and because the repayment timing resulted in an additional $350 tax. As the amount refunded to Ralph is more than $3,000 according to IRC§ 1341a. This is possible for Ralph to use the taxes accrued in the next year from the same refund to cover taxes. So Ralph will say a tax offset of $1,750 instead of a deduction of $5,000.

c.The sum of the deduction must be more than $3,000, according to IRC § 1341(a). Because Ralph spent just $2,500, he is not liable for tax reduction deductions, but can only claim a refund deduction.

7 0
3 years ago
You are negotiating a new labor contract with union officials. The contract covers a plant that has experienced operating losses
Maslowich

Answer:

Is bluffing ethical? Under what circumstances?

Bluffing is basically lying, and lying is wrong. But on some circumstances, specially when you are carrying out a game strategy (and want to win), then bluffing might not be so bad.

Personally, I believe that bluffing is not unethical when you are negotiating with unions. I have nothing against unions, but their duty is to get the highest possible salary and benefits for their members. On the other hand, the company must balance the interests of its employees, the community and its shareholders. Union delegates always make very high initial demands, the company offers a very low increase or raise, and then after negotiating you get to a middle point. So bluffing could be just a strategy in order to negotiate some concessions, e.g. no pay raise until the company starts making a profit again.

What would Kant and Mill say?

Kant believed that the morality of someone's actions should be judged based on their duty. Since it is your duty to try to get some labor concessions, then bluffing is not unethical.

Mill believed that the morality of someone's actions should be judged based on the results, or how much good or happiness results from them. In this case, I suppose that more people would be unhappy than happy if you actually get some labor concessions, so bluffing would be unethical.

What would be the result under the Front Page test?

The front page test basically wants you to look at the events from the point of view of a third party that is not involved in the actions. If you could read this on the front page of a newspaper and it happened to someone else, would it be ethical or unethical? Since I believe that bluffing is a valid game strategy, then if I read this on a newspaper I would be OK with it.

7 0
3 years ago
The company that you manage has invested $5 million in developing a new product, but the development is not quite finished. At a
Elis [28]

Answer:

The company should be willing to invest the cost of $3 million to complete the development of the new product.

Explanation:

First, the correct completion of the question

If it would cost $3 million to finish development and make the product, should you go ahead and do so? What is the most that you should pay to complete the development?

Answer

To determine the cost: It is important to critically consider which costs are already sunk and which are still to come.

First, and foremost, $5 million already invested into the new product represents a sunk cost or a cost that has already been spent. This means that to stop the project or continue the project ,either options will still mean that $5 million has been spend already. It will not affect the future decision.

Therefore, if you decide to stop the production, the cost of the entire project of development is already $5 million

However, if you decide to continue the project

Sunk Cost = $5 million

Cost of continuation = $3 million (This is current relevant cost to consider against the sales).

Expected Sales of the finished product = $4,500,000

Therefore $4,500,000- $3,000,000= $1,500,000

If stopped, the loss to the company is $5 million

If continued, removing the sunk cost, the company can still make a profit of $1,500,000 of the cost of continuation.

The company should finish development and make the product.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Smith Company reports the following information: Cost of goods manufactured $68,250 Direct materials used 27,000 Direct labor in
    12·1 answer
  • What helps advertisers decide what works and what could be improved?​
    11·1 answer
  • New markets has $1,000 face value bonds outstanding that pay interest semiannually, mature in 14.5 years, and have a 4.5 percent
    11·1 answer
  • g Suppose a worker with an annual discount rate of 8 percent currently resides in Chicago and is deciding whether to remain ther
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which is the "father" of the security market lin
    14·1 answer
  • When living off campus, one way to save money is to rent an apartment where:?
    5·1 answer
  • This step in international market research often relates to the cost of collecting primary data that can address the research pr
    15·1 answer
  • "Cookie jar reserves" can best be described as:_______.A) Buying a lot of chocolate chip cookies, storing them for when you have
    15·1 answer
  • Banks fail when the value of bank ________ falls below the value of ________, causing the bank to become insolvent.
    15·1 answer
  • HELPPPPP
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!