Answer:
( 2 , 1 ) , ( 4 , 1 ) , ( 4 , 4 ) .......
Look up Mathpapa.com
It can help with that no problem
Answer:
See explanation below
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, a director of manufacturing must convince management that a proposed manufacturing method reduces costs before the new method can be implemented. The current production method operates with a mean cost of $220 per hour.
a) The alternative and null hypotheses would be:
H0: μ ≥ 220
Ha: μ < 220
b) Comment on the conclusion when H0 cannot be rejected:
When we fail to reject the null hypothesis H0, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method cannot be implemented.
c) Comment on the conclusion when H0 can be rejected:
When the null hypothesis, H0 is rejected, there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method can be implemented.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
ANSWER
EXPLANATION
The given points are:
(1, 4), (2, 9), and (3, 16)
It is obvious that the function is not linear because there is no constant difference among the y-values.
We can however manipulate the y-values to quickly identify the function.
We can infer from the pattern that, the function is;
