Utilitarian ethics is a theory suggests that if playing the killer in simulated killing leads to more unhappiness than not doing so, then playing the killer is wrong.
About Utilitarian ethics
An ethical theory known as utilitarianism establishes right from wrong by emphasising results. It embodies consequentialism in some way. According to utilitarianism, the decision that will result in the greatest benefit for the largest number of people is the most morally right one. For instance, the utilitarian viewpoint holds that you should select the flavour of ice cream that will make you feel the happiest if you are making a decision for yourself. If you like chocolate but detest vanilla, go with chocolate for the delight it will provide and stay away from vanilla as it will make you unhappy.
Consequentialist, welfareist, impartial, and aggregationist are the four distinguishing traits shared by all ethical systems in the utilitarian family. They consequently place the highest moral priority on advancing everyone's general well-being.
To know more about utilitarianism:
brainly.com/question/29313132
#SPJ4
When there is tendency of people taking higher risk during adolescence, then there could be an underdevelopment of the frontal lobe of the cerebral cortex in them
- Adolescence can be regarded as the the process that involves the development from a child into an adult.
- The frontal lobe can be regarded most anterior (front) part of the brain.
- This part of the brain extends from the area which is behind the forehead then to the precentral gyrus.
- The frontal lobe is the part of the brain that serves as one that helps individual to have higher cognitive functions,
- These cognitive function could be memory, motor function, problem solving, as well as emotions and impulse control.
- When there is underdevelopment of this part of Brain during adolescence , it will cause people to be taking risk that is too high for them to take, emotional outbursts would start to take place as well as some abnormal function of memory.
<em>Therefore, frontal lobe of cerebral cortex helps in cognitive functions in people.</em>
<em />
learn more at: brainly.com/question/16132393?referrer=searchResults
<h3>
Answer:</h3><h3>Susanna. People tend to end up with those who match them in attractiveness</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3>
The reason why "Susanna" would be the correct answer because Joe would mostly likely end up with Susanna because she meets the level of attraction that he has.
In life, people most of the time would end up dating/going out with someone that matches their attraction.
For example, a very attractive man would often end up with a very attractive woman. This is because the people would want someone else that they want as their partner meet the "visual" standards that they have.
If someone very attractive ends up with someone less attractive, then there could be a chance that the very attractive person starts losing attraction to the less attractive person, but that's not always the case.
<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
Gezon and Kottak argue that the relatively high incidence of expanded family households among poorer North Americans is
"an adaptation to poverty".
A significantly more typical response from researchers, in any case, was to recommend that discussing the way of life of the underclass was commensurate to "faulting the victim." Bad conduct and poor decisions, in this view, were a justifiable adaptation to poverty and the absence of chance in individuals' lives. In spite of the fact that my examination on the underclass was given a neighborly gathering, the greater part of the scholarly network has mixed around the view that awful practices are a result, as opposed to a reason, of poverty.
