Answer:
All of the above (I, II, III)
Explanation:
Plants (grains) are mostly the organisms found low the food chain, while humans are found at the topmost trophic level on the food chain. Cattle, sheep and goats could be referred to as primary consumers while grains (plants) found at the bottom of the food chain are primary producers. In the food chain, the amount of energy passed from one trophic level to another decreases as only about 10% of energy at a particular trophic level is passed on to the next trophic level.
When humans who are at the topmost trophic level of a food chain feed on primary producers (plants) instead of primary consumers (cattle, sheep), we refer to this as eating lower on the food chain.
When humans eat lower on the food chain (i.e. rely majorly on plants), more grains and agricultural crops would be available for human consumption as a result of less land and grains that would be required to be fed on by primary consumers (cattle, sheep, goats). For example, 1 hectare of grain crop is used to feed cattle, and the cattle is fed on later by humans. If humans feed on grain crops directly instead of feeding on cattle, the 1 hectare of grain crops can serve almost times two of the human population that initially feed on cattle. Less cattle would be kept as humans feed low on grains, which means, more grains would be available as there would be less cattle that would be reared for human consumption. Also, energy lost would be decreased, as more energy gotten directly from the grains would be more than what humans would get when they feed on primary consumers (cattle) that feed on plants
.
- Eating lower on the food chain, which refers to humans eating more primary producers than primary consumers (II), would decrease the energy lost from feeding grains to livestock (I), and could increase grain and agricultural crops available for human consumption (III).
Answer: According to the Social Contract, <em>individuals do what is best for their community.</em> The correct answer is 3.
Explanation:
The Social Contract states that the people need to "bind themselves to each other." This helps to preserve their freedom and then they must give all of themselves to their community.
In this contract, the people all have the same rules and everyone will do the same things without being different from others in the community as a whole.
Since they are all essentially following the same rules and guidelines in the community they will not be able to have any individual rights and oppose the state laws.
No one is set above others in a social contract and there is hierarchy of rich people who have the most power. People will not lose the freedoms they are born with since they decided to enter the social contract.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote the Social Contract and believes this will unify all people of a community. Since they are relying on the community to survive and thrive. It is only a theory and there are still people who believe in this model of living.
Hi !
<em></em>
<em>Question</em>
Why do drive-reduction approaches fail to offer a complete account of human motivation?
Answer:
<em>A. People are sometimes motivated to increase rather than decrease their level of stimulation.</em>
Answer:
glucose, sucrose, lactose, maltose, fructose are all the ones i know. there was no list, so i hope this helps.
