1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cluponka [151]
3 years ago
9

During world war i, why was propaganda important for the war efforts?

History
2 answers:
Citrus2011 [14]3 years ago
5 0
Proponganda was important for the war efforts during World War I because people needed to passionate about the country they were fighting for. This is also known as Patriotism.
Eddi Din [679]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A host of factors was made possible with propaganda which was a norm during the World War I.

They include:

Mobilization of detestation against the enemy

It helped to enlighten and make their people to see the reasons and importance of the war.

It helped in garnering allegiance and cooperation of neutral countries to be on their side during the way and provide the necessary support.

It also helped to strengthen the support of countries who were already allies of themselves.

You might be interested in
The Constitution gives the federal goverment many important duties: making laws, raising money and deciding how to
Mama L [17]

Answer:

National defense is the priority job of the national government.

National defense is the only mandatory function of the national government. Most of the powers granted to Congress are permissive in nature. Congress is given certain authorities but not required by the Constitution to exercise them. For example, Article One, Section Eight gives Congress power to pass a bankruptcy code, but Congress actually did not enact bankruptcy laws until well into the 19th century.

But the Constitution does require the federal government to protect the nation. Article Four, Section Four states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.” In other words, even if the federal government chose to exercise no other power, it must, under the Constitution, provide for the common defense.

National defense is exclusively the function of the national government. Under our Constitution, the states are generally sovereign, which means that the legitimate functions of government not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the states. But Article One, Section 10 does specifically prohibit the states, except with the consent of Congress, from keeping troops or warships in time of peace or engaging in war, the only exception being that states may act on their own if actually invaded. (This was necessary because, when the Constitution was written, primitive forms of communication and transportation meant that it could take weeks before Washington was even notified of an invasion.)

The great irony of our time is that the bigger the federal government has become, the less well it has performed its priority function of providing for the national defense. For example, Congress spent $787 billion in the “stimulus” bill last year, yet not a dime of it was spent on military procurement or modernization—despite the fact that America is in greater danger today than it has been at any time since Communism was threatening Europe in the late 1940s.

The Heritage Foundation has written extensively on the risks facing America and the state of our defenses. Here is a brief summary of the salient facts.

America has no strategy for victory in the war on terrorism—we’re not even calling it a war anymore—and the momentum has shifted to the terrorists. The outcome in Afghanistan is in doubt. If the terrorists succeed there, they can reconstitute their safe havens, plan further attacks on the United States, and threaten to gain control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

The Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, a bipartisan commission with the status of the 9/11 Commission, found unanimously that the terrorists would “more likely than not” develop and use a weapon of mass destruction against a Western city by 2013. The Director of National Intelligence publicly agreed with that assessment.

The international regime for controlling nuclear weapons is broken. Pakistan has a substantial and growing nuclear arsenal. Its intelligence organization has been penetrated by the Islamists. Both North Korea and Iran are steadily increasing the range, payload, and accuracy of their ballistic missiles. No one seriously believes that the Iranians will voluntarily stop their nuclear program or that the West (except perhaps the Israelis) will use force to stop them.

According to our Pacific commander, China is increasing its military strength far more quickly than our intelligence predicted. The Chinese have already acquired an arsenal of advanced fighters and missiles that threatens to deny the American Navy access to the Taiwan Strait. They are building as many as five submarines per year and have established a modern submarine base on the island of Hainan. They have announced plans to build a variety of the ships necessary to field a blue water capability.  

The American military is significantly weaker than it was at the end of the Cold War.  Most of our tankers are equally as old; they will not be replaced, if at all, until the 2030s. The Department of Defense wants to close our most modern cargo aircraft production line and will close our most sophisticated fighter line. The missile defense budget has been cut, and according to most reports, the Obama Administration will cut modernization budgets even further.

As important as it is for the federal government to restrain itself from interfering where it does not belong, it is equally important that the government perform its constitutionally mandated function of providing for the national defense.

America’s global influence is being checked and rolled back, and even the homeland is no longer safe from attack.

The situation can still be recovered, but only if our leaders understand their duty, regain their confidence, and reenergize the defense of freedom here and abroad.

7 0
3 years ago
Analyze the impact of the collapse of the Western Roman Empire on Europe.
KatRina [158]
Upon the fall of Rome, Europe ceased being influenced by the cultures of the Mediterranian coast. 

Hope this helped :)
-Warning2

P.S. Vote me brainiest!
8 0
3 years ago
What is the legal definition of expressive conduct
fiasKO [112]

Answer:

Expressive conduct is behavior designed to convey a message; its function as speech means that it has increasingly been protected by the First Amendment. In determining whether expressive conduct deserves First Amendment protection, courts often apply a two-part test.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Caper : capricious :: A. apis : obstinate B. canis : canine C. leo : feline D. avis : apiary
faust18 [17]

B. canis:canine

because canine is a dog breed and it matches (if you have a Vocabulary Cassical Roots book then you will inderstand why it is the same)

8 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP. How have technological advances affected geography? SELECT ALL THAT APPLY.
prisoha [69]
D and a are the answer I think
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Japan saw industrialization as a way to prevent itself from being invaded by Western powers. Why?
    12·2 answers
  • What amendment to the us constitution changed the way that us senators were elected
    7·2 answers
  • What is the Geneva Conference? What did the Geneva Accords specify?
    7·2 answers
  • Out of what material did many of the pioneer families in the plains states build houses?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the primary way that the economy in the South differed from the economy of the North?
    6·1 answer
  • Rome was strongly in influenced by the culture of the
    7·2 answers
  • What were the impacts of European colonization of Latin America? Explain the PROS and CONS.
    15·1 answer
  • Why is the story of Ayuba Suleiman Diallo unusual?
    12·1 answer
  • Who inspired the idea of a "separation of powers" in the U.S. Constitution? B. Rousseau A Locke D. Hobbes C. Montesquieu​
    5·1 answer
  • HURRY PLEASEEEEE. Mexico City’s population is an example of __________________________. a. the growth of the divide between rich
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!