Answer:
A firm always has a competitive disadvantage when its return on invested capital is:_________
D. below the industry average.
Explanation:
A firm's competitive disadvantage shows when the return on investment is below the industry average. For instance, let us assume that Niposte, Inc. operates in the paper milling industry and that its return on investment of 10% falls below the industry average of 15%, then one can conclude that Niposte, Inc. is not favored in this industry. The cause of such a situation for Niposte, Inc. may be that the ability of its management to turn revenue into profits for stockholders is hampered with excessive costs. This is because the return on investment is a profitability ratio that shows how Niposte, Inc. and its competitors are performing in terms of generating profit from revenue through efficient management of operating costs.
Answer: B
Robert is in the Evaluation of alternatives stage of the buyer decision process.
Explanation:
The various stages which consumers go through when they are considering a purchase are as follows:
Problem or need recognition , Information search
, Evaluation of alternatives
, Purchase
, Post-purchase behavior
Evaluation of alternatives is the third stage in the Consumer Buying Decision process. In this stage, the consumers evaluate all their options based on the attributes of the products which is capable of delivering the benefit/ satisfaction that the consumer intends to get. Comparing the products (i.e different brands of products that is capable of satisfying the consumer needs), shows the alternatives being considered by consumers during the problem-solving process.
Therefore Robert, trying to choose between : Waterbags for Roadies, Supertanker Hydropacks, and Fast Water is in the stage of Evaluation of alternatives stage. Therefore the answer is B
Answer:
The president of Riggs has missed something.
She should make the Sail instead of buying because its cheaper to manufacture than purchasing it outside.
Explanation:
<u>Cost of Manufacturing the Sails:</u>
Direct materials $93
Direct Labor $83
Total $173
The president of Riggs has included the $90 overhead based on $78,000 of annual fixed overhead that is allocated using normal capacity in the cost of manufacturing the sail which is incorrect.
Riggs Company is operating at 80 % of full capacity, hence utelizing the 20% excess capacity would not expand its fixed costs.
Thus said the current fixed cost are irrelevent for this decison and would be incurred whether or not Riggs Company utilizes the excess capacity
<u>Conclusion:</u>
The cost of making the sail is $173 which is lower than the cost of buying them at $ 258.
I would advise The president of Riggs to make the sail by utilizing the excess capacity since its cheaper than purchasing it outside.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option B: second-degree price discrimination.
Explanation:
To begin with, the term of price discrimination, in marketing and economics, refers to the action of charge different prices to different consumers for the same product that do not vary in quality. This concept states fourth differents degrees in order to use the most beneficial strategy to one's company.
To continue,<em> the second-degree price discrimination</em> establishes that companies price products differently based on the preferences of various groups of consumers and furthermore it is very common to <u>apply this type of discrimination through quantity discounts</u> and to add an example, is very common to use this strategy in <u>warehouse retailers such as Costco.</u>
Answer:
1.6 Q1 + 0.875 Q2 = $56
Explanation:
Budget constraint equation represents the total budget allocation to different activities under consideration.
old Budget Constraint
Q1 + Q2 = $56
New Budget Constraint
(Q1)*8/5 + (Q2)*7/8 = $56
(Q1)*1.6 + (Q2)*7/8 = $56
(Q1)*1.6 + (Q2)*0.875 = $56
1.6 Q1 + 0.875 Q2 = $56
So best answer made based on data available.
