Answer:
valid.
Explanation:
Valid is something effective, legally binding or able to withstand objection.
In deductive reasoning, an argument is valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. It is not required for a valid argument to have premises that are actually true, but to have premises that, if they were true, would guarantee the truth of the argument's conclusion. Valid arguments must be clearly expressed by means of sentences called well-formed formulas. The validity of an argument can be tested, proved or disproved, and depends on its logical form.
An argument is a set of statements expressing the premises and an evidence-based conclusion.
Freedom of running for an election
It illustrates how "human nature" is the result of a complex relationship between nature (biology) and nurture (the social environment).
If this is not the case, Anna would end up to grow up into the ordinary woman just like other children in her age.
But instead of this, Anna grew up into a socially incapable child that could barely mutter words that other people could understand.
Under the principle of indirect rule, <u>native culture </u><u>was </u><u>accepted </u><u>to come degree. </u>
<h3>What was indirect rule?</h3>
- The colonial government would be in charge of the whole colony.
- The colonial government would govern the colony through the use of traditional governing institutions.
As a result, the people still had a lot of freedom to engage in their traditions because their immediate government was born from those same traditions.
In conclusion, option A is correct.
Find out more about indirect rule at brainly.com/question/2032130.
