A) All triangles add up to 180° so when given two angles, add those up and subtract them from 180° . That will give you the missing angle.
3-5) When you do A above, and receive the measurement of angle 1, it will also equal 2 and you can repeat A for missing angle 3
6-8) Find the missing angle next to 1, and then subtract that from 180°. That number is the answer for 1. 2 is 55 as its a complimentary (i think thats the right term) angle. Which means it is on the opposite side of an angle. I don't remember how to find 3 however, its been a few years since I've done triangles.
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
12 in = 1 ft
600 in = 50ft
=
600÷4.4 =
136.3636363...≈136
We are required to compare the magnitude for two earthquake intensity:
the larger intensity is 7.9
the smaller intensity is 3.7
thus the ratio of the intensity will be:
(larger intensity)/(smaller intensity)
=7.9/3.7
=2.135
~2
Thus we conclude that:
The larger earthquake's intensity was 2 times as great as the smaller earthquake's intensity.
Answer:
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the standard deviation is less than 14.7.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that that the null hypothesis is
Now given from the question that this null hypothesis was rejected, it mean, in non technical term that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the standard deviation is less than 14.7.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Expand the brackets.
Add -9x and 5x
Add 4x and 6x on both sides.
Add the like terms.
Divide 12 into both sides.
