Answer:
The carnival is most likely to win because it does not have the obligation of protecting a customer from something that they did not do and could not foresee.
Explanation:
As the robbery is an event that has not occurred before at the carnival, the carnival's owner could not foresee it, nor has the owner knowledge of this robbery taking place. So the business does not have the duty of protecting their clients from external things, in other words, from third parties, mostly when they could not predict it. For these reasons, the carnival has a higher probability of winning the case.
Answer:
The brain's resources are limited.
Explanation:
William Jennings Bryan was supporting the usage of silver as a means of exchange in trade, along with the widely supported gold (that is, monetary value would equal a certain weight of gold, and he proposed that it also be equal to a certain weight of silver). . He believed that being limited to only gold would not bring prosperity to the country, for example because of the limited amount of gold available.
Answer:
proactive interference
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various neurologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question her difficulty best illustrates proactive interference. This is the occurrence of when past memories interfere and hold back an individual from retaining new memories. Which seems to be the case in this situation since she can only remember her French Vocabulary even tho she had just studied her Spanish vocabulary.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
That would be an example of <span>grassroots mobilization.
</span><span>grassroots mobilization. refers to the type of regulation that invites civilians to take a more active role in the legislation process.
This often use as a campaign strategy in order to obtain support for the majority of voters segmentation during the election.</span>
