500 ml easy peasy question free points yaay
180-115=65 (just writing this because my answer has to be over 20 characters)
Answer:
She uses her past experiences to give us an idea of how strong women truly are. When she dose this she involves emotional situation to get the audience drown in emotionally, which draws more people to want to support. When she add the part about being a mother and the strength that involved, she was able to connect with mothers everywhere.Women's right was all about allowing women to have the rights that men had, and she uses logic by telling the audience about how both women and men were enslaved and women were able to physically keep up with the men. By explaining things the way she did she made a great case for women's rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
a) point estimate is 30%
b) null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
c) We reject the null hypothesis, percentage working people aged 65-69 had increased
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>a. </em>
Point estimate would be the proportion of the working people aged 65–69 to the sample size and equals
ie 30%
<em>b.</em>
Let p be the proportion of people aged 65–69 who is working. OECD claims that percentage working had increased. Then null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
<em>c.</em>
z-score of the sample proportion assuming null hypothesis is:
where
- p(s) is the sample proportion of working people aged 65–69 (0.3)
- p is the proportion assumed under null hypothesis. (0.27)
- N is the sample size (600)
then z=
= 1.655
Since one tailed p value of 1.655 = 0.048 < 0.05, sample proportion is significantly different than the proportion assumed in null hypothesis. Therefore we reject the null hypothesis.