Answer:
790,000, i.e. $79 x 10,000= 790,000
. Yes, the manufacturer should change the design. 666,667 (when it goes from 1/10,000 to 1/15,000). It is 500,000 (when it goes from 1/10,000 but 1/20,000)
. No, the benevolent social planner would not agree with the manufacturer's decision.
Explanation:
In the estimates provided by the manufacturer, the total cost of the design is equivalent to $79 x 10,000= 790,000. There should be an alteration in the design to remove the necessary precautions. If the probability is different from the estimate provided by the manufacturer, the planner will disagree with the decision made by the manufacturer. For example, a change to 1/15000 will make the total cost to be approximately $666,667.
Answer:
yeah it will be worse than ever
Explanation:
in both cases
Answer:
These two statements are correct:
A. Businesses and jobs rely most strongly on consumer demand.
B.Government regulation is necessary to stabilize the economy.
Explanation:
The first statement is correct because John Maynard Keynes that demand was the most important side of the economy, not supply. This is why his policies are sometimes referred to as "demand-side economics", while the policies of many of his detractors, such as Milton Friedman, are referred to as "supply-side economics".
The second statement is also correct because Keynes believed that a market economy was naturally subject to business cycles: cycles of boom and bust that could either benefit millions, or harm millions. Keynes thought that the government should regulate the economy in order to lessen the effect of those cycles.
Answer:
a. 2.23
b. 3.21
Explanation:
a. Answer to Part A
Payback Period = Investment / Annual Cash Inflow
= 250000 / 112115
= 2.23
Answer to Part B
Payback Period = Investment / Annual Cash Inflow
= 200000 / 62375
= 3.21
Working Note
<em>Particulars Case A Case B
</em>
After Tax Income 72115 39000
Add: Depreciation 40000 23375
Cash Inflow 11,2115 62375
<em>Particulars Case A Case B
</em>
Cost of Machine 250000 200000
Less: salvage Value 10000 13000
Depreciable Value 240000 187000
Life of the Asset 6 8
Annual Depreciation 40000 23375
Answer:
(a) Yes. It is an opportunity cost of new job because the additional time he spent commuting is a cost, as he can utilize that time in doing something else.
(b) Yes. It is also an opportunity cost because if a person wants to join a new job then he have to give up his current job. So, the earning of $45,000 from his current job is the opportunity cost of accepting the new job.
(c) No. It is not an opportunity cost but it is an additional benefit from the new job because he is not sacrificing anything to obtain this benefit.
