Answer:
B. Workers lost these jobs because technological advances increased productivity.
Explanation:
The employees lost employment due to the increased efficiency of technological progress. By improving the productivity of manufacturing drivers, technological advancement expands an economic limit on the possibility of production, allowing equivalent output to be manufactured with fewer resources or more output to be manufactured with the same quantity of resources. For example a machine component that takes 5 men to lift and 10 to assemble in 5 minutes just takes a single machine that doesn't receive wages apart from lubricant a minute to lift and assemble perfectly. Definitely machines are replacing humans to increase efficiency and productivity. Only few humans are employed to supervise and monitor.
The answer to this question is a modified endowment contract. A modified endowment contract or MEC is a type of life insurance policy where in the policy/ insurance is being funded with more money or the insurance premium payment exceeds the amount allowed under the federal law. The modified endowment contracts are taxable.
The factor that the salary hike effect is :
A. Fixed cost
Technically, no matter how much output the workers produced, the wages will stay the same
hope this helps
Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer:
Annual depreciation (year 2)= $20,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Purchase price= $115,000
Salvage value= $15,000
Useful life= 5 years
<u>To calculate the annual depreciation under the straight-line method, we need to use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
Annual depreciation= (original cost - salvage value)/estimated life (years)
Annual depreciation= (115,000 - 15,000) / 5
Annual depreciation= $20,000
