Answer:
find answer in the explanation below
Explanation:
Koby is 16 and that means he is under age for a start. That initial statement makes Fastfood liable.
As it can be seen from the question, the golden rule applies to Koby's case as it is clear he has other things to do with his time.
Primarily, he is a student and that means he has school work to do alongside putting in some hours at Fastfood. But then, he still has the right to be treated right which in this case means him getting some rest. It is therefore safe to say that the manager of Fastfood is trying to take advantage of Koby and should have given him rest.
if he had gotten some rest, he wouldn't have fallen asleep while driving and been in the accident.
Cheers
Answer:
The correct answer is: controlling.
Explanation:
The controlling function in management helps to measure progress towards the organizational goals and brings with it any variations to indicate corrective action. It is a useful tool that allows organizations to verify if everything is happening according to the initial plan adopted.
Answer:
2.21
Explanation:
Portfolio beta = Respective beta*Respective weight
<em>Beta of market=1;Beta of risk-free assets=0</em>
1.28 = (0.25*0) + (0.31*1) + (0.44*Beta of Stock B)
1.28 = 0 + 0.31 + 0.44*Beta of Stock B
1.28 - 0.31 = 0.44*Beta of Stock B
Beta of Stock B = 0.97/0.44
Beta of Stock B = 2.204545454545455
Beta of Stock B = 2.21
Explanation:
Over the past several decades, advances in technology, greatly reduced the cost of making computers which resulted in the decline of the equilibrium price of computers and also resulted in increased equilibrium quantity. The reduction in the computer prices also caused an increase in the consumer surplus.
computer price down -> equilibrium price down
computer price down -> equilibrium quantity up
computer price down -> consumer surplus up
The producer surplus increases due to increase in quantity and at the same time producer surplus decreases due to decrease in price.
computer price down -> producer surplus down
computer quantity up -> producer surplus up
<h2>Direct to the maintenance department</h2>
Explanation:
Jane here works only in the Maintenance department. The work that he does supports both Production as well as Research. We can calculate the expenses, only by associating the department of the employee.
So, the wages should be directly associated to the maintenance department only.
We cannot add one cost to multiple department and it is not the right approach of accounting system. So the below becomes invalid.
<em>Indirect to the production department Direct to the research department Direct to the production department Indirect to the research department</em>
