Answer: The answer is b
Explanation:
The concept of advertising response function is based on the theory of marginal physical product and shows the relationship between advertising and the level of consumption of the goods by the consumers. The theory of marginal physical product states that when there is a change in total product resulting from one unit change in the quantity of the resources used per unit of time. When average product is increasing ,marginal physical product is greater than average product,when average product is maximum ,marginal physical equals average product .when average product is decreasing marginal physical product is less than average product.The theory of marginal physical product can also be called the law of diminishing return which states that if increasing quantities of one factor of production are used in conjunction with a fixed quantity of other factors then, after a certain point each successive unit of the variable factor will make smaller and smaller addition to the total output. In this case, the law tells the Trend Inc when to stop adding more input of the variable factor to a fixed factor.
Invariably, we are saying that it high time for Trend Inc, should spend proportionately less on advertising than on newer line. It should now spend more money on bringing of new product into the market than spending more on the advertisement of the sport shoes because at a certain point the demand for the old product will fall when diminishing return must have set in on the product demand.
Answer:
$16,000
Explanation:
With regards to the above information, we are only concerned with calculating the value of 20 tons of styrene to the company, hence other information are not relevant.
The total value of the 20 tons of styrene monomer to the company would be ;
= 20 tons of styrene monomer × Market price of styrene monomer per ton
= 20 × $800
= $16,000
In this question, we are not provided with the specific numbers that are necessary to produce a graphical approach. Therefore, we cannot provide that part of the answer. However, we are able to talk, in general terms, about what an increase of grain production in the United States would cause in the rest of the world.
This is an effect of what is known as globalization. Globalization refers to the integration of the world's markets in goods and services, as well as flows of investment and people across national boundaries.
In order for globalization to take place, several processes have to occur first. Nations begin specializing in the production of good and services in which they are relatively low-cost producers. This allows for mutual gains for people in trading countries. However, while some groups might benefit, some others might be harmed by this pattern, such as those producing the goods that compete with the imports. In this example, some countries might benefit, but those that compete with the United States in terms of grain production might be damaged by the increased production of the United States.
Answer: hello your question is incomplete attached below is the complete question.
answer :
3.02 million, 2.96 million, 2.91 million
Explanation:
<u>Determine the swap rate over a 3-year period</u>
swap rate = forward exchange rate * exchange amount
For year 1
1.4 * ( 1 + 0.03 / 1 + 0.05 ) * 2.2 million
= 1.4 ( 0.98095 ) * 2.2
= 3.02 million
For year 2
1.4 * ( 1 + 0.03 / 1 + 0.05 )^2 * 2..2 million
= 1.4 ( 0.98095 )^2 * 2.2 million
= 2.96378 million
For year 3
1.4 * ( 1 + 0.03 / 1 + 0.05 )^3 * 2.2 million
= 1.4 ( 0.98095 )^3 * 2.2 million
= 2.90733 million
Answer:
$200 million
$30 million
Explanation:
When the requiredreserce ratio is 15 percent or 0.15 , then the money multiplier is (1 / required reserve ratio) or (1/0.15 = 0.67)
Now, change in money supply = money multiplier * open market purchase of government bonds.
Here , the Federal Reserve a $30 million open market purchase Of govemment bonds.
As a result of this;
Money Supply increases by (6.7 * $30 million) = $200 million.
This is the maximum amount the money supply could Increase.
Now, if the bank holds. $30 million as excess reserves, then money supply could increase by as much as $30 million. This is the smallest amount themoney supply could increase.
So, If the required reserve ratio is 15 percent the largest possible increase in the money supply that could result is $200 million- and the smallest possible increase is $30 million.
