Can someone please help?! I’m confused!?

Step by step what is 3 (x+2)+5x

lesya692 [45]

Answer:

8x+6

Step-by-step explanation:

To simplify it, the first thing you want to do is distribute the three.

So

3(x+2) = 3x+6,

So we can then add the 5x to it.

3x+6+5x

Then, Combine Like Terms

8x+6

6 0

3 years ago

I don't get this at all Plz Help Me

Lera25 [3.4K]

So heterozygous means one dominant trait and one recessive trait (Ll). Homozygous is either 2 recessive traits or 2 dominat. (in this case ll).
1.)Genotype: Ll and ll
Phenotype: 50% chance of Long pea plant, 50% chance of short.
2.) Genotype: Ww (widows peak) and ww (no widows peak)
Phenotypes: 75% chance of widows peak and 25% of no widows peak.
3.) Genotype: BB and Bb
Phenotype: 100% chance of black

3 0

3 years ago

An automobile manufacturer has given its van a 31.3 miles/gallon (MPG) rating. An independent testing firm has been contracted t

Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

$z=\frac{31.1-31.3}{\frac{1.3}{\sqrt{140}}}=-1.82$

The p value for this case would be given by:

$p_v =2*P(z$

For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 31.3 MPG

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

$\bar X=31.1$ represent the sample mean

$\sigma=1.3$ represent the population standard deviation

$n=140$ sample size

$\mu_o =31.3$ represent the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.02$ represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.

z would represent the statistic

$p_v$ represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

We want to test if the true mean is equal to 31.3 MPG, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu =31.3$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu \neq 31.3$

Since we know the population deviation, the statistic is given by

$z=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$ (1)

Replacing we got:

$z=\frac{31.1-31.3}{\frac{1.3}{\sqrt{140}}}=-1.82$

The p value for this case would be given by:

$p_v =2*P(z$

For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 31.3 MPG

4 0

3 years ago

Math question down below

Andrei [34K]

Eq. of given line is x = -2 》x + 2 = 0

6 0

3 years ago

QUESTION IN PICTURE

Rashid [163]

Answer:

3 6/5

Step-by-step explanation:

the fraction is its kinda blurry

4 0

3 years ago