An example of a kind of evidence in this statement is:
<h3>What is an expert opinion?</h3>
An expert opinion is a form of evidence from an authoritative source that backs up a point.
In the text above, the U.S News and World Report were experts or authoritative sources that supported the writer's main point. So, option A is right.
Learn more about expert opinion here:
brainly.com/question/14419930
#SPJ1
The rhetorical strategy that Wiesel is using in the passage is pathos.
<h3>What is rhetorical strategy?</h3>
It should be noted that a rhetorical strategy is the communication tool that's used in written or spoken text in order to affect the reader or listener in an intended manner.
In this case, the rhetorical strategy that Wiesel is using in the passage is pathos. This is the appeal to the emotion of the audience.
Here, Wiesel tried to persuade the audience by evoking certain emotions in order to make them feel the way that he wants them to feel.
It is used to make readers agree to a particular perspective. Therefore, the correct answer is pathos.
Learn more about rhetorical strategy on:
brainly.com/question/6796727
#SPJ1
Complete question:
What rhetorical strategy did Wiesel use in the perils of indifference?
Not sure about the exact circumstances of this question but if I had to choose I’d say C. “Ominous” would be the best word for the blank.
Seldom means rarely, or not often. Doesn’t sound right in the sentence so I eliminated it.
Inquisitive means curious, doesn’t fit the theme created by the “murmur” which sounds much darker.
Stark means out of place, sort of. This is the second best answer but it doesn’t seem as if the men drawing nearer to him was stark at all.
Ominous is basically “creepy, dark, unusual” vibes. It’s like, oh god something bad’s gonna happen, this atmosphere is so ominous. Which fits the sentence best, I think. But I have not read the text nor your teacher’s specific requirements.
