Step-by-step explanation:
Angle 1= Angle 4 (Vertically Opposite Angles)
Angle 3= Angle 2 (Vertically Opposite Angles)
Therefore,
Angle 1= 85 degree
Angle 3= 55 degree
Hope this Helps
Answer:
There is no solution (since none has side length of 4 units)
Step-by-step explanation:
If V (-1,1) is one of vertex of a square, then the next vertex to V distance must be the known value of 4
VA: V to (-3,3) = √(-1 - -3)² + (1 - 3)² = √8 = 2.8
VB: to (-5,-3) = √(-1 - -5)² + (1 - -3)² = √32 = 5.7
VC: o (3,3) = √(-1 -3)² + (1 - 3)² = √20 = 4.47
VD: to (-5,3) = √(-1 - -5)² + (1 - 3)² = √20 = 4.47
VE: to (4,5) = √(-1 - 4)² + (1 - 5)² = √41 = 6.4
The <em><u>correct answers</u></em> are:
60°, 120°, and 180°.
Explanation:
A hexagon has six angles. A full circle is 360°; since there are 6 angles in the hexagon, it will rotate onto itself every 360/6 = 60°. This means that the hexagon will rotate onto itself at angles that are multiples of 60°; this means that 120° and 180° will also do this.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>Given</h3>
<u>The equation for simple interest:</u>
<u>And values</u>
<h3>Solution</h3>
<u>Interest amount is</u>
<u>Solving for annual interest rate</u>
- 160 = 2000*2r
- 160 = 4000r
- r = 160/4000
- r = 0.04
- 0.04*100% = 4%
Annual interest rate is 4%
Yes. If you have very high or very low outliers in your data set, it is generally preferred to use the median - the mid-point when all data points are arranged from least to greatest.
<span>A good example for when to avoid the mean and prefer the median is salary. The mean is less good here as there are a few very high salaries which skew the distribution to the right. This drags the mean higher to the point where it is disproportionately affected by the few higher salaries. In this case, the median would only be slightly affected by the few high salaries and is a better representation of the whole of the data. </span>
<span>In general, if the distribution is not normal, the mean is less appropriate than the median.</span>