Since I am Asian Myself I know what some maybe:
Snail
Dog
Rats
~JZ
Hope it helps
Answer: I. a limit on the launchers for intercontinental ballistic missiles II. a ban on all new missile programs in the US and the USSR
Explanation: The Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) were two rounds (SALT I and SALT II) of bilateral conferences and corresponding international treaties involving the United States and the Soviet Union, on the issue of arms control.
SALT II was a series of talks between United States and Soviet Union from 1972 to 1979 which sought to reduce the manufacture of nuclear weapons. It was a continuation of the SALT I talks with representatives from both countries. This became the first nuclear arms treaty which assumed real reductions in strategic forces on both sides.
The treaty was majorly based on the two points above and elements of this agreement were stated to be in effect from 1979 through 1985.
Explanation:
1. The change initiatives that were promoted in the team were effective because each of the team members was first prepared to assume new roles in order to achieve new goals and improve the quality of work of the product.
2. The team was not resistant to change since first a cheering talk was prepared where they were congratulated for the good work they have done, then through presentation in slides they showed the possible changes to be made and the new assignments to each of The team members.
3.When the team works together and good communication flows, the effectiveness of the team is 100%.
4.I consider that some actions to be implemented to improve the effectiveness of the team are to enhance the best of each member
Sometimes we strive to organize the work of others without really analyzing what their attitudes and aptitudes are. If we know our team and ask everyone to do what they do best and / or that they like to do, we will get much better results, I consider it one of the strategies to work as a team that I should start to consider Improve the results.
Answer:
It provided a way to check the powers of congress and president. Before this ruling, there was no checks and balances.
Explanation:
The 1803 Supreme court case of Marbury v. Madison was an important decision that helped shape the way the powers of the state, as well as the federal government, are dealt with. This event established the case for a judicial review, thereby bringing it for the very first time in the history of the US Supreme Court.
With the case involving the powers of the outgoing and incoming presidents, and the validity of the state and federal powers, the decision laid the groundwork for how the powers of the Congress and the president are limited to. This brings forth the legality of the federal courts to declare any legislation unconstitutional, bringing the step to check exercise of powers. Before this, there had never been checks or balances for the powers of the federal sector.
