1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
juin [17]
3 years ago
8

Why is Miranda v Arizona an important U.S Supreme Court case?

History
2 answers:
morpeh [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Miranda v. Arizona was a significant Supreme Court case that ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless the defendant has been informed of their right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything they say will be held against them.

~i hope this helps~

Explanation:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. ... The court disagreed, however, and upheld the conviction.

KiRa [710]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. ... The court disagreed, however, and upheld the conviction.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What happened when General Grant rendezvoused with Rear Admiral David Dixon Porter for their Mississippi campaign?
andrew11 [14]

<u>The correct answer is: They conducted a siege on the city of Vicksburg. </u> This city was key to the defense of the Mississippi River. After some failures, Grant thought of a very skilful move to take the city from the east, mobilizing his army into a fleet commanded by Admiral David Dixon Porter. They besieged the city of Vicksburg for 47 days and finally had the victory. Grant and Porter had a remarkable relationship both professionally and personally, was a couple with a high impact on the outcome of the war.

 

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone tell me if this sounds good or if it doesn’t, and give opinions on what I would need to change or stay :P
jok3333 [9.3K]
It’s sounds pretty good to me maybe you should add another sentence or not it’s already good to me though :)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who likes my banana
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

bananas are tasty

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How was the role of medical science play in the courts ruling
Natasha_Volkova [10]
It’s Played nonjudicial
7 0
3 years ago
Which one of the following problems may result from a direct democracy
Alika [10]
Excessive chaos because there is a large population to vote for a problem
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements is true about relations between Columbus and the Native Americans?
    15·2 answers
  • Whdsfnfo;idnfidivncivnxivnxovinxvxcvxcxc
    5·2 answers
  • In what way is the purpose of ancient egypt art different from other ancient cultures
    14·1 answer
  • The main participants at the Paris Peace Conference were the leaders of the United States, Britain, and France the leaders of th
    7·1 answer
  • 3 EXPLAINING CAUSE AND EFFECT How did new technology influence the rise and spread of Enlightenment ideas? How did this influenc
    10·1 answer
  • 1. What happened when the Allies occupied Berlin?
    5·1 answer
  • Economics help please <br> thank you
    13·2 answers
  • Why did many English colonists protest the Stamp Act by distributing images such as this one?
    11·2 answers
  • Why does Clinton talk about the national debt even though his administration did not pay it down?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did U.S want to end WWII as quickly as possible?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!