Why is Miranda v Arizona an important U.S Supreme Court case?

History

2 answers:

morpeh [17]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Miranda v. Arizona was a significant Supreme Court case that ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless the defendant has been informed of their right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything they say will be held against them.

~i hope this helps~

Explanation:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. ... The court disagreed, however, and upheld the conviction.

KiRa [710]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

You might be interested in

What event in 1906 prompted many african americans to question booker t. washington's strategy of gradualism and accommodation?

boyakko [2]

the brutal atlanta riots

8 0

2 years ago

What is the structure of the constitution? Be specific

ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

Explanation:The Constitution contains a Preamble, 7 articles, and 27 Amendments. What principles are reflected in the U. S. Constitution

6 0

3 years ago

Read what Franklin D. Roosevelt said when he accepted the Democratic Party’s nomination for president in 1932. "I pledge you, I

kvv77 [185]

Answer:

the answer is C,D

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Which of these is considered a concurrent power

Y_Kistochka [10]

Collecting taxes. Is the answer.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How would bimetallism help the economy, according to its supporters?

galben [10]

Answer:

Basically supporters of the free silver movement thought that bimetallism would help the economy by causing inflation.

This would help farmers and others who had too much debt. Allowing bimetallism would have increased the amount of money that existed in the US.

6 0

3 years ago