Unlike balanced forces, unbalanced forces always cause a change in motion. They are not equal and opposite. When two unbalanced forces are exerted in opposite directions, their combined force is equal to the difference between the two forces and is exerted in the direction of the larger force.
According to research, no statistical relationship type of statistical relationship exists between continuance commitment and citizenship behavior
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
no statistical relationship?</h3>
Generally, If there is a change in one variable (X), and that change causes another variable to rise in a predictable way, then there is a statistical link between the two variables (Y).
It is not required that the systematic growth be accurate (that is, up by 10 units each time), but it should be nearly the same ("around ten").
In conclusion, According to the findings of the study, there is no statistical association of any kind between continuing commitment and civic behavior.
Read more about no statistical relationship
brainly.com/question/15708496
#SPJ1
Answer:
I believe it's the last option.
I say this only because the Allies promised the Arabs that if they rebelled against The Ottoman Empire, that they would get their own independent state, from the land they recieve.
Events that could be covered by renter's insurance are;
<h3>What is Renters insurance?</h3>
Renters insurance sweves as a form of property insurance which cares forlosses to personal property.
Events that could be covered by renter's insurance could be Fire and lightning as well as explosion, the insurance company will inspect and pay for the damages.
Learn more about Renters insurance at;
brainly.com/question/25855858
Answer:
<h3>The Brown v Board of Education case addresses whether public institutions can legally be divided by race.
</h3>
Explanation:
- The Brown v School of Education was a landmark case regarding public school segregation on the basis of race.
- Thurgood Marshall was the chief attorney for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education. The plaintiff attorney ruled out that segregation policy violated the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
- The case won an unanimous verdict against school segregation.
- After the case was won, the Supreme Court outlawed the practice of segregation in any public institutions.
