80p = 80 cents
£1.50 = $1.50.
(changing the signs, that's it)
So if a small bottle is half the size of a large bottle, and is 80 cents.
Amir buys 4 bottles, so 0.80 * 4 = 320 = $3.20.
Now 4 small bottles is the same as 2 large ones, so if he bought 2 large bottles: $1.50 * 2 = $3.00.
$3.20 - $3.00 = 0.20 cents.
Amir would've saved 0.20
P.S. What is "p" in European money
Answer: True.
The ancient Greeks could bisect an angle using only a compass and straightedge.
Step-by-step explanation:
The ancient Greek mathematician <em>Euclid</em> who is known as inventor of geometry.
The Greeks could not do arithmetic. They had only whole numbers. They do not have zero and negative numbers.
Thus, Euclid and the another Greeks had the problem of finding the position of an angle bisector.
This lead to the constructions using compass and straightedge. Therefore, the straightedge has no markings. It is definitely not a graduated-rule.
As a substitute for using arithmetic, Euclid and the Greeks learnt to solve the problems graphically by drawing shapes .
Answer:74.55 beat per minute
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Heart beat is 52 beat per minute
i.e. 
beat per sec
If heart rate is increases 1.25 % each sec
suppose B is the heart beat at first second therefore heat beat at 2 nd second
For 3 rd sec
similarly for 3 sec
Answer:
Two different transformations happen. Rotation/Reflection and translation (I say rotation/reflection because they can both put the parabola where it is after being transformed)
(Rotation- 180 degrees)
(Reflection across its it's starting point)
Translation- pushed up 4 points from negative 4 to 0 on the y-axis
When you put the parent function into a graph it is positive so the u is opening upward and starts at -4. Both sides of the u go through the points (0,0)and (4,0).
But in the transformed function is negative so the u opens downward. The sides going through the points (0,-4) and (4,-4)
I hope this makes sense
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
This kinda looks like the limiting definition of a derivative.
Anyway, what we are doing with the f(2 + h) is evaluating f(x) with 2+h in place for x. That looks like this:
f(2 + h) = 2(2 + h) - 3 which simplifies to
f(2 + h) = 4 + 2h - 3 which simplifies to
2h + 1
From that we are subtracting f(2). What we are doing with that is evaluating f(x) with 2 in place for x. That looks like this:
f(2) = 2(2) - 3 which simplifies to
f(2) = 4 - 3 which simplifies to
f(2) = 1. Now put those together over h to get:
