Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer:
<u>a defense attorney instead</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
From a financial standpoint, a <u>defense attorney</u> would more likely make more money than a<u> juvenile prosecutor</u> because a defense attorney could charge up more for certain cases than been a juvenile prosecutor who wants to ensure someone is convicted.
Also, in terms of purpose, I do feel a defense lawyer could make more impact socially by defending his or her clients.
Answer:
B. are transfers within the same company.
C. have a direct impact on division profits.
Explanation:
Transfer prices can be defined as the amount of money (prices) that is being charged by a division in a business firm for the goods and services provided to another division within the same business firm. Thus, the output of the selling division automatically becomes the input of the buying or receiving division.
The characteristics of transfer prices includes;
I. Are transfers within the same company.
II. Have a direct impact on division profits.
Answer:
See explanation Section
Explanation:
Culver Corporation
Balance Sheet (Current Asset only)
As at December 31, 2017
Particulars $ $
Cash $8,220
Accounts Receivable $97,530
Less: Allowance for
<u>Doubtful Accounts (4,520) </u> $93,010
Prepaid Insurance $6,040
Inventory $34,900
<u>Equity Investments $13,510</u>
Current Assets $155,680
Note: As equity investment will be sold in the next year, it is shown as current assets. Land and patents are property, plant, and equipment.
The pattern that is being referred to above is called the NARRATIVE PATTERN. If a speech contains a story or a series of short stories in it, and only includes a vivid imagery, the setting, plot and characters, then this would fall in the narrative pattern. Narrative means to narrate or to tell something according to the other of when it happened.
