Answer:
$12.50
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Annual dividend next year = $0.75
Growth rate = 4%
Required rate of return = 10%
So by considering the above information, the price of the share is
= Next year dividend ÷ (Required rate of return - growth rate)
= $0.75 ÷ (10% - 4%)
= ($0.75) ÷ (6%)
= $12.50
Hence we considered all the information which is given in the question
Answer:
c rose by 3 percent.
Explanation:
Real income is nominal income less price level changes.
Real income = nominal income - changes in price level
4.6 % - 1.6% = 3%
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The answer is: D) Adam's job has low task identity.
Explanation:
The task identity of a job can be defined as the extent at which that job involves completing a piece of work.
In Adam´s case, to complete a piece of work refers to assembling a whole car. Adam´s job is very specific, fixing nuts and bolts. It´s the perfect example of specialization of labor. He may be very good at doing that, but doesn´t feel good about it.
Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Explanation:
Monopolistic competition is a type of imperfect competition such that many producers sell products that are differentiated from one another as goods but not perfect substitutes (such as from branding, quality, or location). In monopolistic competition, a firm takes the prices charged by its rivals as given and ignores the impact of its own prices on the prices of other firms.
Monopolistic competitive markets:
have products that are highly differentiated, meaning that there is a perception that the goods are different for reasons other than price;
have many firms providing the good or service;
firms can freely enter and exits in the long-run;
firms can make decisions independently;
there is some degree of market power, meaning producers have some control over price; and
buyers and sellers have imperfect information.
Answer:
C. VL = VU + PV(Tax Shield) - PV(CFD)
Explanation:
The static trade off theory is a theory of capital structure in corporate finance, first proposed by Alan Kraus and Robert H. Litzenberger. The theory emphasizes the trade-offs between the tax benefits of increasing leverage and the cost of bankruptcy associated with higher leverage. The <u>answer is C</u> as we know relative to the unleveraged firm, leverage provides both costs and benefits. The benefits are the tax shields provided by debt.
