Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
22,54,8 and 112 aren't prime numbers.
Answer:
gdjtdigdigxigxig
Step-by-step explanation:
hzhfsitdutxigxiycoyxigxitxi
I would convert them to improper fractions and then multiply. The improper fractions would be 35/4*13/6, and then you multiply across, 455/24, and that doesn't reduce, but you can convert it back to a mixed number, which is 18 23/24.
Using derivatives, it is found that the best estimate of f '(2) based on this table of values is of 10.
The rate of change <u>from x = 0 to x = 2</u> is given by:

From <u>x = 2 to x = 4</u>, it is given by:

The average of these rates is:

Hence, the best estimate of f '(2) based on this table of values is of 10.
To learn more about derivatives, brainly.com/question/18590720
Complete question :
Birth Month Frequency
January-March 67
April-June 56
July-September 30
October-December 37
Answer:
Yes, There is significant evidence to conclude that hockey players' birthdates are not uniformly distributed throughout the year.
Step-by-step explanation:
Observed value, O
Mean value, E
The test statistic :
χ² = (O - E)² / E
E = Σx / n = (67+56+30+37)/4 = 47.5
χ² = ((67-47.5)^2 /47.5) + ((56-47.5)^2 /47.5) + ((30-47.5)^2/47.5) + ((37-47.5)^2/47.5) = 18.295
Degree of freedom = (Number of categories - 1) = 4 - 1 = 3
Using the Pvalue from Chisquare calculator :
χ² (18.295 ; df = 3) = 0.00038
Since the obtained Pvalue is so small ;
P < α ; We reject H0 and conclude that there is significant evidence to suggest that hockey players' birthdates are not uniformly distributed throughout the year.