All categories

3 years ago

Reanna eats 72 chicken wings. Jesus eats 102 chicken wings more than Reanna. How many chicken wings do they eat altogether?

Mathematics

2 answers:

suter [353]3 years ago

7 0

246 is ur answer cause 102+72=174+72=246

julsineya [31]3 years ago

6 0

72+72+102=246 is your Answer

You might be interested in

Please answer this correctly without making mistakes

Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance is given by

d = sqrt( (x2-x1) ^2 + ( y2-y1) ^2)

Since the x values are the same

d = sqrt( ( y2-y1) ^2)

d = sqrt( (( -6 - 10)^2))

d = sqrt((-16) ^2)

d = 16

We can also just find the number of squares between the points since the x value is the same.

10 - -6

10+6

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

X was a sacrifice ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

stellarik [79]

Answer:

yes next y will be a sacrifice

Step-by-step explanation:

i did it

3 0

2 years ago

A swimming pool is draining at a constant rate. The table shows the proportional relationship between the change in the water le

kaheart [24]

Answer:

first answer:-1.75

second:-15.75

third:-40.25

Step-by-step explanation:i am too lazy srry

6 0

3 years ago

The square root of -108 minus the square root of -3

Lady_Fox [76]

square root(-108) - square root(-3) =8.66025404 i

6 0

3 years ago

The owner of a cattle ranch would like to fence in a rectangular area of 3000000 m^2 and then divide it in half with a fence dow

Reika [66]

If you notice the picture below, the amount of fencing, or perimeter, that will be used will be 3w + 2l

now $\bf \begin{cases}
A=l\cdot w\\\\\
A=3000000\\
----------\\
3000000=l\cdot w\\\\
\frac{3000000}{w}=l
\end{cases}\qquad thus
\\\\\\
P=3w+2l\implies P=3w+2\left( \cfrac{3000000}{w} \right)\implies P=3w+\cfrac{6000000}{w}
\\\\\\
P=3w+6000000w^{-1}\\\\
-----------------------------\\\\
now\qquad \cfrac{dP}{dw}=3-\cfrac{6000000}{w^2}\implies \cfrac{dP}{dw}=\cfrac{3w^2-6000000}{w^2}
\\\\\\
\textit{so the critical points are at }
\begin{cases}
0=w^2\\\\
0=\frac{3w^2-6000000}{w^2}
\end{cases}$

solve for "w", to see what critical points you get, and then run a first-derivative test on them, for the minimum

notice the $0=w^2\implies 0=w$ so. you can pretty much skip that one, though is a valid critical point, the width can't clearly be 0

so.. check the critical points on the other

8 0

3 years ago