Answer:
that the statutes do not violate the state constitution or the us constitution.
Explanation:
State courts can remove laws from the bench. Think about what the supreme court does on a daily basis which is to review laws and determine if they are allowable under the constitution, think roe v wade, brown v board of education. state courts do this too. Think the recent texas abortion law. State courts have the responsibility to solve cases in a constitutional manner.
Answer:
The illusion of time
Explanation:
This is because younger people think that they have time to save up later; that if they spend now, they can always make up for it later. On the other hand, older people know that they don't have much time (comparatively) to save money as they did before, so saving money becomes a bigger deal for them.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Many studies have found a positive correlation between economic growth and living standards. This means that empirical works have found that countries with higher economic growth, often have better living standards than the countries with less economic growth. In this case if real GDP per capita of both countries is similar, then they are comparable.
We can deduce that the country B will experience an increase in living standards much more rapidly in the long run because economic growth leads to an increase in profits for firms, there would be a better capital and labor return. This means that firms will pay more for capital and labor, if households are de owners of capital and labor, their rents and wages will increase. The disposable income will increase for households and they will consume more goods and services, then their living standards will increase.
Answer:
$850
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Initial investment = $15,000
Expected annual net cash flows over four years, R = $5,000
Return on the investment = 10% = 0.10
Present value of an annuity factor for 10% and 4 periods, PVAF = 3.1699
The present value of $1 factor for 10% and 4 periods = 0.6830
Now,
Net present value = [ R × PVAF ] - Initial investment
= [ $5,000 × 3.1699 ] - $ 15,000
= $15,849.50 - $ 15000
= $849.50 ≈ $850
Answer: $1,031 million
Explanation:
Given that,
Retained earnings(2010) = $14,329 million
Retained earnings(2009) = $13,157 million
Net income(2010) = $2,203 million
Amount of dividends = Retained earnings(2009) + Net income(2010) - Retained earnings(2010)
= $13,157 million + $2,203 million - $14,329 million
= $1,031 million
Therefore, amount of dividends did Colgate-Palmolive pay to its shareholders in 2010 is $1,031 million.
