a+b+c=9 and a2+b2+c2=35 then by using identity
(a+b+c)2=a2+b2+c2+2ab+2bc+2ca,we get the answer 9x9=35+2(ab+bc+ca)
2(ab+bc+ca)=9x9-35
2(ab+bc+ca) =81-35then we get ab+bc+ca=46/2 so ab+bc+ca=23
Answer:
A) no solution
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>1. X + 1 and X -1 -1 do </em><em>not equal</em>
<em>2. This </em><em>equation does not provide enough facts</em><em> to be able to solve this</em>
<em>3. It is a </em><em>trick question</em><em> </em><em>don't fall for it</em>
<em></em>
<em>Have a nice day!</em>
Answer:
Ok y= 2x + b
b referring to any number less than -2 and more than -2
so y=2x+4 can work
Step-by-step explanation:
parallel lines in slope-intercept form have the same slope, i.e. the same 'm' value or coefficient of <em>x</em><em> </em> but different interceptions
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
3x2 - 5x+1 + 2x2 +9x-6
Combine like terms
5x2+4x-5 which is C
You are welcome and don't for get to click <u>THANKS</u>
Answer:
d) This is a completely randomized design with two explanatory variables (factors).
Step-by-step explanation:
Explanatory variables are independent variables.
In this case, I prepared two explanatory variables, which are : (i)30-second ad
(ii) 60-second ad,
Then, the explanatory variables were assigned to 4 treatment groups, and each variable is done once or thrice.
All subjects are assigned randomly to all treatment groups, with each treatment group seeing one. We can conclude that this is a completely randomized design with two explanatory variables.
