Answer:
A strictly dominant action produces: a higher payoff than any other action the player can use for every possible action of the other players.
Explanation:
A strictly dominant action does not play fair. Here, there is no equality because strict dominance requires all payoffs to be strictly greater.
A strictly dominant strategy is that strategy that always provides greater utility to a the player, no matter what the other player's strategy is.
A rational player will avoid a strictly dominated counterpart because if his opponent uses strictly dominated action he will be come out worse off regardless of which moves other players make.
Answer:
$4,750
Explanation:
The computation of the depreciation expense is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
where,
Original cost = $18,000 + $500 + $2,500 = $21,000
And, the other items would remain same
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would be equal to
= ($21,000 - $2,000) ÷ (4 years)
= ($19,000) ÷ (4 years)
= $4,750
Answer:
It generates huge employment opportunities. This has changed the face of retailing in India. As the sector is booming in India, a career in retail sector is promising a growth potential for the ambitious youngsters.
The candidates are trained in supply chain management, finance management, marketing information, electronic retailing, marketing and business communication, customer relationship etc. With rapidly expanding departmental stores and huge shopping malls, plenty of job opportunities are opening all over India.
Sales and related jobs
Store manager
Visual merchandiser
Regional sales manager
Finance and accounting
Explanation:
Hope it helps
Answer:
1. If a firm increases its dividend payout rate the: firm will have less cash available for new investment. True
2. Stock price will likely fall by the same percentage. False
3. Retention ratio will rise at the same rate. False
Explanation:
1. If a firm increases its dividend payout rate the: firm will have less cash available for new investment. This assertion is true because the company would be paying out a larger portion of earnings as dividends, hence the balance portion for new investment will be lower as a result.
2. Stock price will likely fall by the same percentage. This assertion is most unlikely because normally, if a particular stock is paying higher dividends investors will have high expectation and be willing to pay a higher price to buy a stock that pays high dividends
3. Retention ratio will rise at the same rate. This conclusion is also incorrect because pay out ratio and retention ratio have an inverse relationship. If more dividend is paid out, then less money is retained.
Answer:
40. Somewhere peaceful surrounded by nature
42. i am actually not sure
