Efficiency because if you don't have very good efficiency then somebody can't really read it so they won't know what it's saying.
You do not need to configure a certificate authority on your network to use EFS.
<em>EFS</em> is the short form for<em> Encryption File System</em>. With EFS, users can encrypt their files and folders and even the entire content of a given drive. By encrypting these files and folders, the access to them are restricted and thus increasing, improving and enhancing the security level of the users' data.
In other words, even though there are other ways to restrict access (such as using <em>logon authentication</em> and <em>NTFS file permissions</em>), EFS allows to add another layer of security to data.
To <em>encrypt</em> and <em>decrypt</em> data files and folders in EFS, a <em>certificate authority (CA)</em> could be used. This is however not a requirement. In the case where there is no certificate authority, EFS will sign a default certificate that will be used for encryption. In other words, <em>EFS will generate its own certificate</em> if none does not exist.
<em>The following are other things to note about EFS</em>
i. EFS uses a public and private key pair to encrypt data.
ii. Users do not need to enable EFS. It is enabled by default.
iii. For EFS to encrypt a file, the NTFS file system must be used.
Since a certificate authority is not required on your network to use EFS, the correct option is:
(b) False.
Read more at: brainly.com/question/10410730
Answer:
The complete reaction is given in the image attached below for better understanding and elaboration
Answer:
why do u want to do that i have an acc i dont even use that is so good with so much uc and other skins on it
Explanation:
Answer:
2. SSL can interact with its earlier versions which is a vulnerability
Explanation:
TLS (Transport Layer Security) and SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) are both used for providing data authentication and encryption between networking devices (such as servers, PCs and applications) operating over a network. The iterations of SSL were versions 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0. But then, all these iterations had security issues and so TLS 1.0 was released to improve on those security flaws. And seeing that SSL can interact with its earlier versions which are all vulnerable, downgrading TLS to SSL for compatibility sake will abuse the essence of TLS in the first place.
