Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
ram.asked me not to stand
Communication involves both listening and speaking. When you say "What I'm hearing you say" is an example of reflective listening because you are trying to clarify the idea of what the other party is trying to imply. Then listener recaps the message using his own words and tries to give back the speakers idea to confirm if the idea has been understood.
Answer:
1. Dividends = It will be classified as <u>dividends.</u>
2. Rent Revenue = It will be classified as <u>revenues.</u>
3. Advertising Expense = It will be classified as an<u> expense.</u>
4. Stock holders pay cash into business = It will be classified as <u>Issuance of stock.</u>
<u></u>
Dividends are the share of revenue distributed to stockholders.
Revenues are income earned by the company.
Expense are the outflow of cash or bank payments for running the business.
Issuance of stock refers to collection of money by the company through issuing equity or preference shares.
