Answer:
Explanation:
Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or (c) to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism. Although those three views disagree about which kinds of consequences matter, they agree that consequences are all that matters. So, they agree that consequentialism is true. The utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham is a well known example of consequentialism. By contrast, the deontological theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are nonconsequentialist.
Consequentialism is controversial. Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one’s duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one’s own heart, actualizing one’s own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others—no matter the consequences.
This article describes different versions of consequentialism. It also sketches several of the most popular reasons to believe consequentialism, along with objections to those reasons, and several of the most popular reasons to disbelieve it, along with objections to those reasons.
Answer:
Son palabras que siempre acompañan a un sustantivo y concretan su significado. Son palabras variables: concuerdan en género y número con el sustantivo, y si tiene un adjetivo, también con él.
Explanation:
Both Leaders challenged the European Union.
And they both studied chemistry at universities.
Please correct me if I'm wrong!! :)
Estereótipos construídos ao longo de 517 anos que massacram e invisibilizam os povos indígenas. A última mesa da Festa Literária Internacional de Cachoeira (Flica), neste domingo (8), propôs a reflexão a respeito dos equívocos históricos e culturais perpetuados dentro das escolas, rodas de conversas e todas as esferas políticas e sociais quando o assunto e o povo indígena.
Com os escritores Daniel Munduruku e Eliane Potiguara, o público foi convidado a se livrar de amarras do preconceito enraizado e que destrói milhares de culturas indígenas que resistem no Brasil: uma proposta de descolonização do pensamento.
"Meu avô costumava dizer o tempo que nós vivemos é o melhor tempo. Não é tempo atual não fosse bom, não se chamaria presente. Nós não somos nem o passado e muito menos do futuro, somos sempre apresentados ", disse o escritor Daniel Munduruku. Para ele, há 517 anos de idade, um desencontro entre pessoas, quando a cultura europeia tentou suprimir a cultura indígena e provocou uma cisão.
Answer:
Industry
Explanation:
Industrial and manufacturing activities were smaller in the ancient Rome.
