Explanation:
Law does not function in vacuum. Law operates for and in the society; and it is influenced by the mores and attitudes of the society. Correspondingly, law is an instrument of social change. The law thus never can be static; it has to change constantly with the changes in the society. Judiciary plays a major role for this change since judges interpret and redefine the laws through their judicial decisions. The demands of the time and society become prominent factors for judge in the law interpretation process. Their judicial opinions consequently become precedents - 'settled' or 'established' law that can provide legal foundation for settling subsequent cases. Hence, those who are associated in the field of law have to read case judgments for their research or academic purposes.
Mere knowledge of legal rules is not enough to do research in law. It also needs the analytical skills to extract ratio, observation and to apply these principles in different factual situations. This paper endeavors to identify certain parameters, which by no means are exhaustive but are only enabling points which could help a researcher to read and understand the judicial opinion. To achieve the very purposes of reading, the yardstick is not mere the ability to read, but to comprehend very essence of what is written.
The author believes that when a judgment is written well with clarity and consistency, even a common man would be able to figure out the contours of law. Since the objective of any judgment or judicial opinion is justice, the judge's conveying skill and the reader's skill ought to converge upon a common end.
Answer:
Dissenters
Explanation:
The term dissenters was widely used in 17th and 18th centuries. Generally, these dissenters were only a group of people that opposed the states' intervention to personal religious matters. (At that time, England wanted the church to be heavily involved in all political decisions).
But, many church officials at that time blatantly categorized these dissenters as someone who oppose the church and Christianity as a whole to diminish public support for them.
ANSWER
Dear George my closest brother,
you may not feel the same but as a young man living in the north, in April of 1861 i would be willing to die for what i believe because, just like Ulysses S. Grant, having the courage to help free slaves and give black men the right to vote, i want to have the courage to help my country, live to be a free state, and if that means fighting and more likely dying for everyone i am willing to do that. i would rather have a peaceful talk or argument instead of a war but some things dont go as planned. so my brother if i die in this war, i wish the best for you and hope you will make the right choices.
Explanation:
this isnt much but i hope this helps you.
A lot of people died and wounded
Emperor Frederick Barbarossa, King Philip II of France, King Richard I of England
