Answer:
Neil Shubin bases his argument that the anatomy of Tiktaalik is relevant to that of humans by discussing specific features of the anatomy of Tiktaalik that vary from typical fish anatomy and correspond to features of the human body. For example, he points out that Tiktaalik has a neck that is able to bend independently of the rest of the body, unlike fish, and like all terrestrial vertebrates, including humans. Therefore, the evolutionary history of humans can be traced to an organism similar to Tiktaalik, resulting in the concept of the "inner fish."
Explanation:
I think it is both. sorry if i’m wrong
Answer:
The sequence data that would support this hypothesis would involve there being relatively more differences found between the three mitochondrial genes' sequences of the La Plata River dolphin and the sequences of the Chinese River dolphin.
There should also be fewer differences between the three mitochondrial genes' sequences of the La Plata River dolphin and the sequences of the Amazon River Dolphin.
Explanation:
This is because fewer differences between the mitochondrial gene sequences of two species indicate closer relatedness and more differences indicate lower relatedness.
It is not acceptable to say that the mesosaurus could have traversed from one continent to another via the ocean. Although Mesosaurus is a reptile that could propel itself through water with its long hind legs and limber tail. There is no possibility that the Mesosaurus would have the ability to swim across such a large body of ocean because it was a coastal animal.
Answer:
It wouldn't thrive as much as a regular plant because it has shorter roots. It's ability to gather water in order to make food is lessened.
Explanation: