1. Britain
2. colonies
3. thirteen
4. months
5. delegates
6. strong
7. president
8. three
9. branch
(My apologies if I'm wrong on anything)
The correct answer is True (Structural functionalism)
Structural-functionalism took social anthropology as a science that should be developed along the lines of the natural sciences, because it defended that society functioned according to laws that could be identified.
For this approach "each society studied was considered as a 'totality', as an organism whose parts were integrated and functioned in a mechanical way to maintain social stability". Principles were sought in common between social structures in order to understand the function that those elements in common played for the maintenance and cohesion of society.
Among these are the "feeling systems" that "regulate the performance of individuals according to the needs of society", feelings developed in the individual from a social construction. Thus, individuals are an expression of the social structure by reproducing moral norms and civil rules that keep society cohesive, for Radcliffe-Brown “society is cohesive by virtue of a structure of legal rules, social statutes and moral norms, which circumscribe and regulate the behavior". We can see the enormous influence that Durkheimin's theory has on structural-functionalist thinking.
Radcliffe-Brown starts to use the comparative method of the tests of the field research to analyze the “total cultural systems” looking for universal principles for human societies, because “the field work must look for the abstract structural principles and the“ mechanisms ”of integration of society".
Answer: ''Life is not fair'' truism
Explanation:
Truism is referring to some statement that is clearly true and evident, it often sounds foolish and it is used in situation of irony. Since it is evident, it don't need evidence or description.
Examples of truism that we see often:
The apple never falls far from the tree.
An apple a day keeps the doctor away.
A friend in need is a friend indeed.
Life is not fair.
- I will give you an example of ''Life is not fair'' truism.
This truism is worth defending because in some situation it is not considered as truism because it is up to people and ideas that they are having about life. It can be true or false. It is challenging because it depend on people and their situations or positions.
My experience is considering that this truism is not worth saying because life has numerous of situations for us and we are not always seeing some fair things that are happening. It always can be worst and if we always repeating that ''Life is not fair'' it will give us negative emotions which is not good.