Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
During erikson's stage of intimacy, a individual have to examine to be impartial about his or her actions.
Intimacy versus isolation is the sixth stage of Erik Erikson's concept of psychosocial development. This stage takes location all through young adulthood between the a while of approximately 18 to 40 yrs. During this stage, the essential warfare centers on forming intimate, loving relationships with different people.
<h3>What is intimacy in adulthood?</h3>
Romantic and sexual relationships can be an vital part of this stage of life, however intimacy is extra about having close, loving relationships. It includes romantic partners, but it can also encompass close, enduring friendships with humans backyard of your family.
Learn more about intimacy stage here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/27507161</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
Increasing democratization is the factor contributing to the acceleration of globalization.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- In globalization political participation gets the increase.
- It also reduces inequality.
- It also increases the levels of education in poor countries.
- It explains the political changes in the country.
- It depends upon factors such as the economy, history, and civil society.
- It makes leaders more accountable to the citizen.
- It removes the unusual transaction in political participation.
- It plays a major role in education and economic development.
- The important benefits of globalization are the lower cost of living, more wealth in the world.
Answer:
post-conventional
Explanation:
Post-conventional level of moral development: The term post-conventional is one of the levels of moral development and is considered to be the third level in the theory. The theory of moral development is proposed by one of the famous psychologist named Lawrence Kohlberg.
The post-conventional level is responsible for governing moral behavior through a self-chosen system based on rational ethical principle but not through convention or fear.
In the question above, Max is best classified as being in Kohlberg's post-conventional level of moral development.
