1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
UkoKoshka [18]
3 years ago
6

Traditional drug supply reduction strategies have never proved to be effective. What are two reasons for this failure?

Law
1 answer:
Gre4nikov [31]3 years ago
7 0

<u>Reason for the failure of traditional drug supply reduction strategies that have never proved to be effective:</u>

Despite measures taken by national governments and international organizations with various supply reduction strategies. One of the main reasons why it failed is because of the financial investment involved in eradicating the coca and poppy fields which is highly prevalent in countries like Afghanistan.

The investment required for this eradication campaign involves both money as well as large amount of labor as this is a manual labor intensive exercise.

Another important reason is due to the challenges involved in removal of precursor chemicals (material that is used as raw material for producing plant based drugs) as it is also used in legally manufactured products like Paint, Cleaning materials and Medicine. Due to this, drug networks use official import documents for import of these materials.    

You might be interested in
What are the steps too becoming a detective?
Mariulka [41]

Answer:

Step 1: Educational Requirements

Depending upon your state regulations, you need a minimum of a high school diploma or equivalent to formal education of associate or bachelor’s degree in private investigation, criminal justice, criminal procedure, forensic sciences, or a related law enforcement field.

Step 2: Finding the Job

Detectives usually begin their career as police officers. They have good employment potential in several specialized areas of investigative work. In multiple capacities they may work independently, as a private detective, or work in collaboration with police or law enforcing agencies. Very often these jobs are full-time with paid overtime prospects. To begin working as a detective, around 90 days are required to complete the entire application process for the grant of a detective license.

Step 3: Training Requirements

As the job meets the public’s need for protection and justice, the detectives are exposed to the dangers of facing the criminals, suffering injuries or even death, so the detective license is granted after a rigorous process of selection criteria, written work, viewing physical fitness profile and interviewing. Private detectives may either apply for an armed or unarmed investigation license. They may be required to complete a formal firearms training course, or rights and responsibilities training course that empowers them to help law enforcing agencies arrest the criminals

Step 4: Licenses and Certifications

Private detectives are required to file state licensing application. They must also submit fingerprints, background check, provide two passport photos and pay application fee. The state agency then conducts a private investigator proficiency test that requires high standards of ethics, professionalism, no legal convictions, and clean bank debt records. Depending upon state regulations, the private candidates are required to carry insurance policies to carry out their investigation career. Detectives can have a variety of certifications suiting areas of detective work and job nature.

3 0
2 years ago
What factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation?
devlian [24]

The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.

For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means

  • There are two types of tortious interference
  1. Tortious interference with contract
  2. Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
  • Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project

From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct

Learn more Tort interference from:

brainly.com/question/15058912

8 0
2 years ago
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) addresses clean air and water issues.
TiliK225 [7]
Not in the “environmental “ concept, but they could in a work setting concept.

Example-clean drinking water for employees or air filtration at a plant—- yes


Water issues 70 miles away unrelated to their plant. No
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can state law statue supersede municipality ordinance
Drupady [299]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

because it is made from president and our thinking

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jordan is especially interested in the concept of being presumed innocent until proven guilty. He is convinced that most jurors
Arisa [49]

Answer:

This is a difficult situation. If a juror would see the defendant crying it could impose that they are sorry for what they did if they were guilty. Dressing appropriately can show you're not a bum and do have dignity. Acting appropriately can impose you are mature.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • DUE TONIGHT How could the remapping of Texas be applied to example and explain the state's Don't Mess With Texas, age old attitu
    13·1 answer
  • What makes fingerprints individual and unique? How do scientists match a fingerprint to a specific person?
    10·1 answer
  • Your judgement is not affected by your emotions? True or false
    9·2 answers
  • What was historically significant about Mosaic Law?
    10·2 answers
  • Please answer question in a few sentences... I will mark you brainliest
    6·2 answers
  • Why is compromise so important in a democracy?
    9·1 answer
  • An arrow in this color signals the end to your protected turn period
    9·1 answer
  • Explain at least two New York State alcohol related violations
    11·1 answer
  • How can we encourage you to engage and participate more in the program? Any safety requirement, dietary requirement, allergies,
    15·1 answer
  • What are executive orders examples?.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!