1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
UkoKoshka [18]
3 years ago
6

Traditional drug supply reduction strategies have never proved to be effective. What are two reasons for this failure?

Law
1 answer:
Gre4nikov [31]3 years ago
7 0

<u>Reason for the failure of traditional drug supply reduction strategies that have never proved to be effective:</u>

Despite measures taken by national governments and international organizations with various supply reduction strategies. One of the main reasons why it failed is because of the financial investment involved in eradicating the coca and poppy fields which is highly prevalent in countries like Afghanistan.

The investment required for this eradication campaign involves both money as well as large amount of labor as this is a manual labor intensive exercise.

Another important reason is due to the challenges involved in removal of precursor chemicals (material that is used as raw material for producing plant based drugs) as it is also used in legally manufactured products like Paint, Cleaning materials and Medicine. Due to this, drug networks use official import documents for import of these materials.    

You might be interested in
Barbie committed a felony and has to appear in court.
horrorfan [7]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Record the type of committee you are researching, what the committee does, and who participates in the committee.
cricket20 [7]

Answer:

So I would have A B C D, but it doesn't matter if you chose any or all

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The diagram below shows steps in a civil case in Florida.
LenKa [72]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Cou
Burka [1]

Answer:

The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.

Explanation:

The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers.  This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions.  The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage.  With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an example of how the U.S. Constitution limits government power through checks and balances?
kakasveta [241]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The president is able to veto legislation passed by Congress

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Testable hypotheses ?
    14·2 answers
  • Who convince your parents to sign papers to become emancipated
    9·1 answer
  • In the early history of law enforcement
    15·1 answer
  • 55 PTS!
    6·2 answers
  • Descripe two ways in which the law protect citizens against xenophobia​
    7·1 answer
  • Which kind of question would a civil trial most likely try to answer?
    10·2 answers
  • Sarah and Lucia were accepted to the same college. The two women decided to share a house during the school year. They both sign
    8·2 answers
  • Which unit of the military has 90% failure rate for their training recruits ?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the only type of evidence that the attorneys or expert witnesses create?
    12·1 answer
  • discovery in the process of serving a summons and a copy of a commplaint on a defendant true or false
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!