Supporters of Hamilton’s view that a bill of rights could be dangerous to liberty couldpoint to which of the following cases?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Sidana [21]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A (Schenck vs United States 1919)

Explanation:

Hamilton was of the opinion that it is highly possible for a bill of rights to have detrimental effects on the society and this can be pictured from the case between Schenck vs United States, in which the United States Supreme Court ruled they could restrict the First Amendment which afforded speech freedom if the words posed a clear danger to the society.

You might be interested in

Someone who betrays his or her country, like Benedict Arnold

Schach [20]

Im pretty sure its traitor

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The emperor of France during America's undeclared war with France was ___.

serious [3.7K]

I think is Napoleon

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Research evidence suggests the _____ is important in the formation of explicit memories and the _____ is important in the format

Gnesinka [82]

Answer:

hippocampus; cerebellum

Explanation:

Hippocampus - it is a type of structure that main function lies in learning and memory. It is enclosed in the temporal lobe and can be disturbed by different stimuli. There are two Hippocampi, one on either side of the brain. if either part of Hippocampus got damaged by anyway, then it can lead to loss of memory

cerebellum

- Its main function is to receive the stimuli related to information from sensory system. Its main function lies in coordination, balances, body postures, etc.

5 0

3 years ago

The term "judicial review" means that the Supreme Court has the ability to determine if

Elena L [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

i took the test

8 0

3 years ago

do you think that President Nixon was involved in an attempted cover-up of his involvement in Watergate? PLEASE HELP ME

artcher [175]

Answer:

YES.

Explanation:

Watergate was clearly a coverup by Richard Nixon. the evidence provided and the information that was being hidden proved that while he may and probably did not directly erase information he was the man who gave the order to have it done. The real question is was he wrong? many believe that those in that power must commit these kinds of acts to effectively do their jobs.

4 0

2 years ago