3 years ago

Supporters of Hamilton’s view that a bill of rights could be dangerous to liberty couldpoint to which of the following cases?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Sidana [21]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A (Schenck vs United States 1919)

Explanation:

Hamilton was of the opinion that it is highly possible for a bill of rights to have detrimental effects on the society and this can be pictured from the case between Schenck vs United States, in which the United States Supreme Court ruled they could restrict the First Amendment which afforded speech freedom if the words posed a clear danger to the society.

You might be interested in

What is the legal term for a type of evidence that, unless refuted by evidence to the contrary, will prove a case?

lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

Prima facie

Explanation:

Prima Facie

A prima facie case is a situation, case or defense that is without a shadow of doubt established by a party's evidence to justify a verdict in his or her favor, as long as such evidence is not rebutted by the other party.

Prima facie is all about an evidence that is good and sufficient on its face value to establish a given fact or to prove a case

7 0

3 years ago

Why was mountain olypus important to the greeks?

DaniilM [7]

They believed that it was the home of the gods

6 0

3 years ago

You may legally turn right on a steady red light _______________.

SCORPION-xisa [38]

B is the correct answer

4 0