Supporters of Hamilton’s view that a bill of rights could be dangerous to liberty couldpoint to which of the following cases?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Sidana [21]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A (Schenck vs United States 1919)

Explanation:

Hamilton was of the opinion that it is highly possible for a bill of rights to have detrimental effects on the society and this can be pictured from the case between Schenck vs United States, in which the United States Supreme Court ruled they could restrict the First Amendment which afforded speech freedom if the words posed a clear danger to the society.

You might be interested in

These were a series of late-19th century conflicts between the British Empire and Afrikaners in South Africa.

icang [17]

The First and Second Boer wars were a series of Conflicts between the Bristish Empire and the Afrikaners in South Africa. The prinicpal biligerants during on the Bristih End included The British Colonial Marines, as well as auxiliary forces from India, Austialia, Canada and New Zealand. On the Afrikaner side it was The South African Republic and the Free Orange States. The Outcome of the wars was a British victory with the signing of the Treaty of Vereeniging.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Endgame sucked, Change My Mind

Rudik [331]

Answer:

i cant change your mind you are right

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

for burt, who has claustrophobia, a small dark room creates a small amount of fear, a stairwell creates a bit more fear, and an

Katen [24]

The aspect of exposure hierarchy that Burt, who has claustrophobia, expresses when he ranks his fear is known as Stimulus Hierarchy.

Stimulus Hierarchy is an aspect of exposure therapy where the psychologist asks the client to rank his fears.

The fears are ranked from the lowest to the highest. So, the least feared appears at the bottom while the most feared occurs at the topmost level.

The Graduated exposure therapy is a form of behavioral therapy. It was developed by Joseph Wolpe.

Learn more about Exposure Therapy here:

brainly.com/question/7315613

5 0

2 years ago

From a law and policy perspective, what needs to be done in order to effectively address racism in the United States? Need help

Kaylis [27]

i feel like the the governor or president should address something about racism because it really isn't the job of the citizens but i'm glad that the citizens do address it and i would probably address it when im older but its sad that they really don't address it and it's probably because they don't want to do with it and they will someday i have no idea if this was the answer you were looking for or even if this is an answer but i thought i would just say what i thought i don't even think this is what you asked for but anyways .-.

5 0

3 years ago

Why did the Framers provide ways for each of our government to check the powers of the other branches? Give an example of how on

MAVERICK [17]

The point of checks and balances was to make sure no one branch would be able to control too much power, and it created a separation of powers. Here are some examples of how the different branches work together:

The legislative branch makes laws, but the President in the executive branch can veto those laws with a Presidential Veto.
The legislative branch makes laws, but the judicial branch can declare those laws unconstitutional.

6 0

2 years ago