Protists are a group of organisms that are characterized as Eukaryotes that are neither plants nor animals nor fungi. They are very diverse, and there are many hypotheses about their classification. The cladogram for protists is constantly changing and, sometimes, there are opposite hypotheses that both have data to support them. What is the implication of a changing hypothesis.
It is acceptable because data are still being collected.
It is acceptable everything in science should always change.
It is not acceptable because the correct answer needs to be found.
It is not acceptable because science never changes.
Answer:It is acceptable because data are still being collected.
Answer: C
. They should map out a grid to systematically look for evidence.
Explanation:
As a crime has been committed, the investigators do not need a search warrant so there is no need to ask a Judge for one so option A is incorrect.
It is best if evidence is searched for in different locations not just the primary scene so option B is incorrect.
Setting up a grip to enable the systematic analysis of evidence is their most likely course of action so option C is correct.
Even if the case is not complicated, evidence still needs to be searched for so option D is wrong.
The habitat with equal numbers of all the different species will have the higher diversity.
