The correct option is in-home interviews.
Executive interview have essentially the same advantages and disadvantages as in-home interviews.
In-home interviews are comprehensive sessions which join perception and meetings to produce profound logical comprehension.
According to the leader-member exchange theory, the individual worker is the situation, and therefore, each dyadic relationship will be somewhat different.
The leader-member exchange theory is a relationship-based approach to leadership theory that suggests leaders and members develop distinctive relationships. These relationships depend on their social give and take. The standard of these exchanges within an organization can heavily influence employee outcomes. This theory emphasizes the two-way relationship between leaders and followers.
The main motive of the leader-member exchange theory is to denote an explanation of the outcomes of leadership on members, organizations, and teams. This theory suggests that leaders do not treat every subordinate in the same way. In return, this treatment of the subordinates by their leader determines their work-related attitudes.
Learn more about Leader-member exchange theory: https://brainly.in/question/9862449
#SPJ4
Answer:
Break-even point in total units= 951.7units
Explanation:
<em>Break-even point is the level of activity at which a firm must operate such that its total revenue will equal its total costs. At this point, the company makes no profit or loss</em>.
It is calculated using this formula:
<em>Break-even point (in units) = Fixed cost/ average contribution per unit</em>
<em> Blue Plaid</em>
Contribution per unit 43-30 = 13 52-45 = 7
<em>Average contribution per unit </em>
= ( (13× 4) + (7×5) )/9
= $ 9.66 per unit
<em>Break-even point in total units</em>
= $9200/$ 9.66
= 951.7units
Break-even point in total units= 951.7units
Answer: The correct answer is "relative perfomance".
Explanation: According to Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2014), in winer-take-all markets, the compensation (e.g., revenues) is mainly determined by <u>relative perfomance.</u>
A type of market in which the winner takes everything clearly implies that the best competitors are those who take a large proportion of rewards while the worst little or nothing. To say that it is determined by their relative performance, refers to the subjects receiving rewards based on their performance in relation to the other competitors.
