They don't hit their break even point with all of the additional costs. They are still $11060 under the break even point at the end of the month
Answer:
Silent partner.
Explanation:
<u>Chloe is a </u><u>silent partner</u><u> in this vintage fashion boutique.</u> A silent partner or sleeping partner is that <u>who invest</u> in the business and have still<u> shares in the profits and losses </u>of the business, but who is <u>not involved in day-to-day business transactions</u> and in its management and his/her<u> personal property is not at risk</u> in case the business suffers losses as here Chloe and Tamara invested equally but Chloe is not taking part in the management of the business but still shares the profit and loss occurred but her personal property is not at risk<u> in case of firm's insolvency.</u>
According to functional job analysis, all jobs require workers to interact with data, people, and things. There are different ways to conduct a functional job analysis, but these ways measure workplace roles through established scales. These scales are usually categorized into seven categories: data, people, things, instruction, reasoning, math, and language.
Functional job analysis is the practice of examining job requirements and assigning a suitable candidate for that job or examining a candidate's qualifications and skills and assigning a suitable job to that candidate. It also works in reverse by not matching the wrong candidate with the job or vice versa. An obvious example is not hiring someone with no hands to do any job that requires lifting things. With only two types of jobs in a small business, this is not a difficult proposition. In a large company with thousands of people doing hundreds of different jobs, it can become a Gordian knot. It is up to the functional job analyst to become Alexander with the sword.
Learn more about functional job analysis:
brainly.com/question/24239905
#SPJ4
The question is incomplete. Here is the complete question.
Caribou Gold Mining Corporation is expected to pay a dividend of $6 in the upcoming year. Dividends are expected to decline at the rate of 3% per year. The risk-free rate of return is 5%, and the expected return on the market portfolio is 13%. The stock of Caribou Gold Mining Corporation has a beta of .5. Using the constant-growth DDM, the intrinsic value of the stock is _________. A. $150 B. $50 C. $100 D. $200
Answer:
$50
Explanation:
Caribou Gold mining corporation is expected to make a dividend payment of $6 next year
Dividend are expected to decline at a rate of 3%
= 3/100
= 0.03
The risk free rate of return is 5%
= 5/100
= 0.05
The expected return on the market portfolio is 13%
= 13/100
= 0.13
The beta is 0.5
The first step is to calculate the expected rate of return
= 0.05+0.5(0.13-0.05)
= 0.05+0.5(0.08)
= 0.05+0.04
= 0.09
Therefore, the intrinsic value of the stock using the constant growth DDM model can be calculated as follows
Vo= 6/(0.09+0.03)
Vo= 6/0.12
Vo= $50
Hence the intrinsic value of the stock is $50
Answer:
The answer is: B) The statement is false. A decrease in the price of digital cameras would decrease the demand for non-digital cameras, but a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would not cause the demand for non-digital cameras to decrease.
Explanation:
Suppose we are not currently living in 2019, instead we are back 12 years to 2007 (before the iPhone). Back then , digital cameras were still used by common "unprofessional" users. Digital cameras were an improvement compared to non-digital cameras, so the price of non-digital cameras were much lower than their digital counterparts.
If the price of digital cameras decreased, then the price of non-digital cameras would decrease also. For example, if luxury car companies like Mercedes Benz started selling sedan cars for $20,000, Ford and Chevrolet would be forced to lower the price of their cars since they wouldn't be able to compete with MB at the same price.
But a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would never decrease their demand. Something else would have caused that decrease. Probably digital cameras became so cheap that everyone could afford one and since they were so much better than non-digital cameras, people simply stopped buying non-digital cameras.
