The correct answer to this open question is the following.
There is no question here. It is just a statement.
However, doing some research we can say that the proper question for this statement is the following: <em>"Is Mark's service in a jury a responsibility or an obligation?"</em>
If that is the case, then the correct answer is "an obligation."
According to the laws of the state, an individual who is summoned by the state to be part of a jury has the obligation to attend. If he or she does not attend, he should be fined according to the law. If the individual cannot attend, it has to be for a very important situation that has to be explained. Otherwise, the state will consider his +/her negativity to attend as a contempt of court.
so the first example is taxes, as britain enforced them on sugar and molasses which eventually led to the american revolution. and 2nd example is stationing troops as they issued a series of facts known collectively. this was hard for the colonists as they had difficulty maintaining a force about it, as well as having problems with the timeline of the american revolutuon
The people who would of opposed Hamilton’s plans would of been that of the Democratic-Republicans who more less followed behind Thomas Jefferson. They believed that the country should be passed around that of a strict interpretation of the constitution with the thought that the economy should be based around that of agricultural rather than trade. The group was worried about Hamilton’s plans because they believed that it gave too much power to the government & opposed the national bank. They didn’t want a repeat of what they had experienced with Great Britain
They were desperate, despairing
and, urge and desire the need for the Muslim to rule saying, “We like your rule
and justice far better than the state of oppression and tyranny in which we
were. The army of Heraclíus we shall indeed… repulse from the city”. They
wanted and favored the justice and system of the Muslims instead of the
Byzantine’s. In which case, this case the Muslim’s won the battle and the Hims
started to welcome them into their gates.
Historians need to make a picture of history so people can understand what happened. They use fossils and artifacts to make a picture of what that period of time was like. They interpret objects, and read scripts from that time to trust understand what was going on. This way, people can understand and learn from the past. We do not have to make history repeat itself.
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST THANKS!!
