Answer: $7,000
Explanation:
As the question says, a total of $35,000 is paid for 12,000 square feet of space and that the rent is apportioned on the basis of space.
Department One occupies 2,400 square feet of that space.
Calculating the proportion it occupies is,
= 2,400/12,000
= 20%
Since it occupied 20% of the total space then it should be charged 20% of the rent bill.
= 20% * 35,000
= $7,000
Department One should be charged rent expense for the period of $7,000.
Answer:
understand
Explanation:
by understanding each other and work inline with the business goal in order to achieve the business objective
Answer:
$1,115.58
Explanation:
Calculation to determine how much should you be willing to pay for this bond
Using this formula
Bond Price= cupon*{[1 - (1+i)^-n] / i} + [face value/(1+i)^n]
Where,
Par value= $1,000
Cupon= $35
Time= 10*4= 40 quarters
Rate= 0.12/4= 0.03
Let plug in the formula
Bond Price= 35*{[1 - (1.03^-40)] / 0.03} + [1,000/(1.03^40)]
Bond Price= 809.02 + 306.56
Bond Price= $1,115.58
Therefore how much should you be willing to pay for this bond is $1,115.58
When a manager needs to make a decision using the ethical decision-making process and reaches the second stage, they check whether the decision violates the c. fundamental rights of any stakeholders
The ethical decision-making process involves making decisions that are consistent with the relevant ethical views of the company which it draws from the society it is based in.
The second stage of this process involves checking whether the ethics involved in a certain decision, would violate the fundamental rights of shareholders which include:
- The right to ownership
- The right to Dividends
- The rights to evaluate corporate decisions
- The right to voting power
This is to ensure that the shareholders are taken care of because the first duty of a manager is to their shareholders.
In conclusion, managers need to check whether a decision affects the fundamental rights of shareholders before they embark on it.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/8864856.</em>
<em />
The options for this question include:
a. utilitarian beliefs
b. the global commons
c. the fundamental rights of any stakeholders
d. home country values
Answer:
<h2>In this case,visit to the Butchart Garden is an excludable and non-rivalrous good and is an example of a Club Good.</h2>
Explanation:
First,since the Burchart Gardens charges an admission fee of $30 for each visitor,anyone who has not paid the fee cannot or will not be able to have access inside the garden.Therefore,it is currently not a free service for all the visitors.In this sense,a visit to the Butchart Garden is excludable.It can be assumed that any visitor who wishes to come inside the garden and have a visit will have to mandatorily pay the admission fee.
Secondly,as Butchart Garden is a public area and anyone who pays the admission fee can officially gain access to the garden,enjoyment of the natural and aesthetic beauty of the garden by any one visitor does not reduce the simultaneous enjoyment of any other visitor who has paid the admission fee and hence,gained access to the garden.In economic language,if we consider the garden visit as a particular commodity,then the consumption of the commodity by any one visitor or consumer does not reduce the simultaneous consumption of any other visitor/s or consumer/s,provided that they have all paid the admission fee to gain access to the commodity or garden in this case.Therefore,visits to the Butchart Garden can be considered as non-rivalrous.
Now,since the visit to the Butchart garden is both excludable and non-rivalrous in nature,it can be considered as an example of a Club Good.
