Answer:
This poem details the two paths, making clear the amount of use either has sustained. Frost goes through the visual of examining each path, which is like a person examining what the outcomes might be if they were to choose one of two choices or "paths". He then goes on to say that he hopes he can come back to the fork in the road but doubts that he will. This can be related to when a person has to choose between two opportunities of somewhat equal appeal, they know they must choose one but still hope that the other might become available again sometime in the future. Then Frost goes on to say that the path he chose, the "one less traveled by", has "made all the difference". It can therefore be interpreted that by taking the leap, taking the risk, has helped him greatly. Frost makes good use of repetition, similes, as well as metaphors. He also uses elegant descriptions to help the reader visualize the paths.
Answer: Narrator is talking with a child in his mind
Explanation:
The Willow-wren and the bear
Evidence that best supports this conclusion is that the narrator is talking and interpreting in this story with a child in his mind and we can see that in a part:
“Pau Amma’s babies hate being taken out of their little Pusat Taseks and brought home in pickle-bottles. That is why they nip you with their scissors, and it serves you right!”
It is like he is talking about something that is showing us the experience of a child.
Answer:
to give the reader a visualization using imagery
Explanation:
I think its either prey or predator adaption let me know if im wrong
