Answer:
It's at the end of chapter 25, an quote <em>" Mr. Underwood simply figured it was a sin to kill cripples, be they standing, sitting, or escaping. He likened Tom’s death to the senseless slaughter of songbirds by hunters and children"</em>
Explanation:
The line above connects to the title due to the symbolism of the mockingbird in the story; the mockingbird is the <u>idea of innocence</u>, throughout the story the innocence of different character has been corrupted or totally destroyed by the evil that they have had contact with through different situations; therfore when in Mr. Underwood's editorial says that is a sin to kill cripples, it's talking about the innocence of the cripples, no matter their situation and continues with Tom's death, been the senseless slaughter, as he describe, is the slaughter of innocence.
In conclusion, the quote connects to the title because it talks about the symbolic act of killing innocence in different forms.
The answer is "economic hardship perspective".
Economic stress in families and lives speak to reliant, issue zones, however most work to date has overlooked this basic relationship.The monetary hardship viewpoint accept that the money related issues realized by separate are most in charge of the issues kids confront.
Answer:
Endorsing a presidential candidate is more likely to be done by a national party than a local party.
Explanation:
This is because when it's local, it's usually in support of local elected officials. It has nothing to do with national officials. However, when it is a national party, they could endorse a presidential candidate because that is ultimately more important and affects all people- hence the national. This is because whoever is chosen in such an important election changes the future of a country, and is something national organizations should deal with- not local ones.
