1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
makkiz [27]
2 years ago
11

A firm offers a 10-year, zero coupon bond with a face value of $1,000. What is the current market price if the yield to maturity

is 7.6 percent, given semiannual compounding
Business
1 answer:
viva [34]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Current market price is  474.30  

Explanation:

The current price of the bond can be computed using the pv function in  excel as stated thus:

=-pv(rate,nper,pmt,fv)

rate is semiannual yield to maturity which is 7.6%/2

nper is the 10 years of bond tenure multiplied by 2

pmt is the coupon payable which is zero

fv is the face value of the bond which is $1000

=-pv(7.6%/2,20,0,1000)=$ 474.30  

You might be interested in
The factor-price equalization theory and transportation costs Which of the following statements about the factor-price equalizat
abruzzese [7]

Answer:

B and C

Explanation:

The correct statements about the factor-price equalization and the effects of transportation costs are:

  1. Free trade, in the absence of transportation costs or other barriers to trade, tends to equalize product prices and factor prices.
  2. Transportation costs prevent product prices from equalizing.
6 0
3 years ago
A public debt which is owed to foreigners can be burdensome because: a foreign interest rates are persistently higher than domes
yulyashka [42]
<span>A public debt owed to foreigners can be burdensome because B) payment of interest reduces the volume of goods. This can usually be seen illustrated in the form of a nation lending another nation money. The debt is public because the whole nation takes it on. The lending nation then is lacking in terms of use by the lending nation.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Statement: "Whenever a company’s activities reduce the quality of life for nearby homeowners, the company should be legally requ
olganol [36]

Answer:

2) assumption not made

Explanation:

The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.

maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.

4 0
2 years ago
The following data pertain to an investment proposal (Ignore income taxes.):
Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

The closest answer is option A,$7649

Explanation:

The net present value of the investment is the present value of annual cost savings minus the initial cost of investment.

present of cash flow=cash flow/(1+r)^n

r is the discount rate of 12%

n is the year the cash flow relates to ,for instance year zero for the initial investment

NPV=-$54,000+$16,000/(1+12%)^1+$16,000/(1+12%)^2+$16,000/(1+12%)^3+$16,000/(1+12%)^4+($16,000+$7,000)/(1+12%)^5=$ 7,648.41  

note that the project gives $7,000 in salvage value in year 5

4 0
3 years ago
A tax exempt municipality is considering the construction of a new municipal waste water treatment facility. Two different sites
In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt A is 2.15 and The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt B is 1.35

Explanation:

In order to calculate the incremental benefit/cost ratio for both of the two alternatives we would have to make the following calculations:

For ALT A

PV of benefits = $2,111,404 * [1-(1.06)^-75]/0.06 = $34,744,943.5

Therefore, incremental benefit cost ratio = $34,744,943.5/$16,161,644 = 2.15

The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt A is 2.15

For ALT B

incremental benefits = ($3,019,639 -$2,111,404) * [1-(1.06)^-75]/0.06 = $14,945,777.2

incremental benefits = $27,211,376 - $16,161,644 = $11,049,732

Therefore, incremental benefit cost ratio = $14,945,777.2/$11,049,732 = 1.35

The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt B is 1.35

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following would be​ true? A. Organizational culture never changes. B. Organizational culture is an evaluative rathe
    11·2 answers
  • On January 1, 2021, Frontier World issues $40.6 million of 8% bonds, due in 15 years, with interest payable semiannually on June
    13·1 answer
  • The following statements accurately describe the difference between saving and investing EXCEPT…
    6·1 answer
  • Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered.
    15·1 answer
  • Suppose the demand for Digital Video Recorders (DVRs) is given by Q = 250 - .25p + 4pc, where Q is the quantity of DVRs demanded
    15·1 answer
  • _____ is defined as the process a company employs to externally search for and source research, new technologies, and products.
    15·1 answer
  • Why is 'time' a sensitive factor to consider when deciding whether to choose debt or quity financing?
    5·1 answer
  • The liabilities of Wildhorse Company are $113,000 and the owner’s equity is $235,000. What is the amount of Wildhorse Company’s
    7·1 answer
  • If there was important presentation and a conference you were invited to on the same day, how would you tackle it
    5·1 answer
  • Catalog companies are committed to selling at the prices printed in their catalogs. a. If a catalog company finds its inventory
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!