Jane Eyre and Daisy Miller . a study
In both novels the narrations shape the idea that the ladies in the stories are young, inexperienced but they have a purpose, though it is not clear which it might be.Having in both cases unreliable narrators who describe with the little information they have, lets the reader judge by themselves the path the lives of these two female protagonists could follow.
In the case of Daisy Miller James uses a third person narrator with a limited amount of information to share.This perspective with certain limitations , seems to be that of Mr Winterbourne.This type of narrator makes the story rich in the sense that it creates an atmosphere of doubt about Daisy´s intentions and beleifs.The voice which is used by this narrator chosen by James is conversational and also cheerful, with a carefree tone. It appears that the author wants the reader to capture Daisy´s naive manners by using the voice of a narrator that considers her like that.
Jane Eyre on the other hand,expresses her own feelings and narrates whatever she experiences.The author uses her point of view to give the reader the same picture Jane has.The purpose of Bronte could also be for the reader to be as surprised or sad about the events as Jane is in the story.Innocent and full of hopes when she is chosen for performing a job at the manor, her voice guides the reader into her life with the same insecurities she had and her same expectations.
As a conclusion, the role of narration and point of view are essential in both stories and help the reader have a picture of the girls .By using the word picture I mean that the narrators capture moments in both lives and leave the rest to the action that develops and the decisions the girls make.
Answer:
The title of the book relates to the story because Lennie is loves to pet mice. And, in a way, he has the intelligence of a tiny creature, like a mouse. ... The title of the book is very symbolic of Lennie and George's relationship.
Explanation:
I hope this answers your question for i wasn't given a source or an excerpt so i looked it up.
"<span>When he is first seen by Faustus, he is horrendously ugly. Faustus immediately sends him away and has him reappear in the form of a Franciscan friar. The mere physical appearance of Mephistophilis suggests the ugliness of hell itself."
Technically this is not a math equation so i hope its ok to quote. </span><span />
Answer: Their wages wouldn’t even get them out of debt to my grandmother, not to mention the staggering bill that waited on them at the white commissary downtown.
Explanation:
By stating that the town's cotton pickers had wages that could not even get them out of debt with their grandmother, Maya Angelou infers that the cotton pickers were paid meagre salaries which meant they were poor people who were even in debt with the White Commissary downtown which probably supplied them with their farming equipment.
<em>I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings</em> is an autobiography of Maya Angelou depicting her life as a child growing up with her momma ( grandmother).
