The better the IRR, the better. but, a corporation may additionally decide on a mission with a decreased IRR as it has other intangible advantages, together with contributing to a larger strategic plan or impeding competition.
Solution:
NPV of Project S= -$1,000 +$895.03/(1+10.5%) + $250//(1+10.5%)^2 +$10//(1+10.5%)^3 +$5//(1+10.5%)^4 =25.49320776
IRR of Project S= -$1,000 +$895.03/(1+r%) + $250//(1+r%)^2 +$10//(1+r%)^3 +$5//(1+r%)^4 =0
IRR =12.80%
NPV of Project L = -$1,000+ $5/(1+10.5%) +$260/(1+10.5%)^2 + $420/(1+10.5%)^3 + $802.50/(1+10.5%)^4
=$67.01
IRR of Project L=
-$1,000+ $5/(1+r%) +$260/(1+r%)^2 + $420/(1+r%)^3 + $802.50/(1+r%)^4 =0
IRR =12.700%
Project L is better than Project S since L has higher NPV
IRR of Project L is 12.7%.
Learn more about IRR here:-brainly.com/question/28428807
#SPJ4
Answer:
The carrying value decreases from the issue price to the par value over the bond’s term.
Explanation:
The carrying value of a bond is the par value or face value of that bond plus any unamortized premiums or less any unamortized discounts. The net amount between the par value and the premium or discount is called the carrying value because it is reported on the balance sheet. When a bond is issued at a premium, the carrying value is higher than the face value of the bond.
<span>there is typically enough medium that is not cleared to show "no reaction"</span>
<span>middle-aged. Some contributing factors to this are: a) after children grow up, some couples no longer have a common goal. b) infidelity, typically involving a younger person that brings excitement. c) people are living longer, so some people want to get out now rather then spend the additional years in misery.</span>
What do we want is the answer I believe, correct me if I’m wrong