<span>To calculate the absolute price elasticity in this case, the expression is the quantity demanded change divided by the change in the price, both expressed as percentages. For the sandwiches, the demand dropped by (50/250), or 20% (0.20), while the price increased by (1.00/2.00), or 50% (0.50). The expression, then, would be (0.20/0.50), or a price elasticity of demand of 0.40.</span>
Answer: A. Amanda will not win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge.
Explanation:
Based on the information that was provided, Amanda will not win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge.
The employer-at-will simply means that an employer can dismiss his or her worker as long as it's not illegal. In this case, Amanda will not win because she's hired "at will," and in such cases, the courts will deny her any loss claim that results from her dismissal.
Principal (P) = $13300
Rate of interest (r) = 3.7%
Number of times compounded in a year (n) = 2
Number of years (t) = 18 years
Then
Amount = P(1 + r/n)^nt
= 13300[1 + (0.037/2)]^36
= 13300[1 + 0.0185]^36
= 13300(1.0185)^36
= 13300 * <span>1.9346
= 25730.54 dollars
From the above deduction, it can be concluded that the correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C".</span>
I would say C because the definition of diplomatic is having or showing an ability to deal with people in a sensitive and effective way.
b. buy enough of the two goods such that the marginal utility from the last dinner consumed is four times greater than the marginal utility from the last video.
This is because they are paying 4 times as much for the dinner so should get 4 times the utility from it.
