Answer:
Explanation:
Get in touch with your local Jehovah's Witness branch. They can give you an earful on this subject.
They have religious reasons for objecting to transfusions. When it comes to children, the courts have overruled them saying that the welfare of the child is more important than any medical objection or argument that the witnesses may have.
People with Leukemia at some point in course of their disease, may need a transfusion. Nothing else will do. The cells in blood fight foreign antibodies and transport oxygen to organs that need it. If a patient's own blood can't do it, then a transfusion becomes necessary.
The courts have a right to dictate terms when children are involved. The courts do not have the same right with adults. If an adult chooses to end the suffering, they have that right. There even comes a point (in Canada at least) where death is an option. But an individual patient must give knowledgeable consent to taking his own life.
So medicine has a say in some things and not in others. In the United States, the population has not given up on the rights of the 1st amendment. And medicine can override even those rights.
Answer:srry but dont get it
Explanation:lol imslowie
It would most likely mean that it is a really serious case
Hope these helped :)
Answer:
Inherent powers
Explanation:
Inherent Powers are said to be the powers that are not expressly defined or bestowed on the person using or applying the power to get things done.
Hence, in the case of the United States President, Inherent Power is the power or authority that President can use to get certain job done right or to perform his or her constitutional responsibilities.
It is to be noted that, these INHERENT POWERS are not specified in the Constitution, they are however considered to be reasonable powers delegated to the President to perform his duties in certain situations.
