All categories

3 years ago

What is Dubai's GDP in 2016? please help me

Mathematics

1 answer:

Vilka [71]3 years ago

7 0

Just put grapy=1/2x-3 in the google search engine and it pops up

You might be interested in

Find the inertia tensor for an equilateral triangle in the xy plane.

ivanzaharov [21]

Find the inertia tensor for an equilateral triangle in the xy plane. Take the mass of the triangle to be M and the length of a side of the triangle to be b. Express your answer below as pure numbers in units of Mb^2. Place the origin on the midpoint of one side and set the y-axis to be along the symmetry axis.

7 0

3 years ago

What is 8.362 rounded to the nearest hundredth?

Aleksandr [31]

Answer:8.300

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Take a look at the pictures. The first one has the map and question. The second one has the possible answers.

LenaWriter [7]

The Answer Is B And C.

6 0

3 years ago

The heights (in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) for a sample of 40 women were measured. Using technology with the

Viktor [21]

Answer:

There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women

Step-by-step explanation:

The correlation coefficient between the variables h(height in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) is 0.202

Sample size n=40

Level of significane alpha = 0.01

Create null and alternate hypothesis as:

H0: r=0

Ha: r not equal 0

(Two tailed test at 1% significance level)

Sample r = 0.202

r difference = 0.202

test statistic t = $\frac{r\sqrt{n-2} }{\sqrt{1-r^2} } \\=\frac{0.202(\sqrt{38} )}{\sqrt{0.9592} } \\=\frac{1.25}{0.9794} \\=1.271$

df =n-2 =38

t critical value for 0.01 and df =38 is 2.704

Since our test statistic lies below 2.704, we accept null hypothesis

There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women

7 0

4 years ago

I don't understand geometry at all please help me.

lukranit [14]

I know its one of the congruent ones, as one is for sure a 90 degree angle, on top of an 180 degree angle, which by law of supplementary angles makes the other one 90 degrees. Not sure on the postulate, maybe someone else can help with that.

6 0

3 years ago